Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions.
Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ · 1997
View Original AbstractUsing a cellular telephone while driving was associated with a fourfold increase in collision risk.
Plain English Summary
Researchers used a case-crossover design to study 699 drivers who had cellular telephones and were involved in motor vehicle collisions with substantial property damage but no personal injury. The risk of a collision during a call was four times higher than when not using a telephone, with a relative risk of 4.3. Calls placed within five minutes of the collision had a relative risk of 4.8, while hands-free units offered no safety advantage over hand-held units.
Why This Matters
The study analyzed 26,798 calls over a 14-month period. Thirty-nine percent of drivers called emergency services after the collision, indicating a potential benefit of having a telephone.
Study Details
Because of a belief that the use of cellular telephones while driving may cause collisions, several countries have restricted their use in motor vehicles, and others are considering such regulations. We used an epidemiologic method, the case–crossover design, to study whether using a cellular telephone while driving increases the risk of a motor vehicle collision.
We studied 699 drivers who had cellular telephones and who were involved in motor vehicle collisions...
A total of 26,798 cellular-telephone calls were made during the 14-month study period. The risk of a...
The use of cellular telephones in motor vehicles is associated with a quadrupling of the risk of a collision during the brief period of a call. Decisions about regulation of such telephones, however, need to take into account the benefits of the technology and the role of individual responsibility.
Show BibTeX
@article{da_1997_association_between_cellulartelephone_calls_2534,
author = {Redelmeier DA and Tibshirani RJ},
title = {Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions.},
year = {1997},
doi = {10.1056/nejm199702133360701},
url = {https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199702133360701},
}Cited By (1,257 papers)
- Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular TelephoneInfluential
David L. Strayer, W. Johnston (2001) - 1,189 citations
- Cell Phones and Driving: Review of ResearchInfluential
A. McCartt et al. (2006) - 324 citations
- Children's health and environment : a review of evidence : a joint report from the European Environment Agency and the WHO Regional Office for Europe : experts' cornerInfluential
G. Tamburlini et al. (2002) - 188 citations
- Neural mechanisms of dual-task interference and cognitive capacity limitation in the prefrontal cortexInfluential
Kei Watanabe, S. Funahashi (2014) - 178 citations
- Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distractionInfluential
M. Sodhi et al. (2002) - 177 citations
- Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Cognitive Distraction While Multitasking in the AutomobileInfluential
D. Strayer et al. - 156 citations
- Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?Influential
Y. Ishigami, R. Klein (2009) - 151 citations
- Problematic mobile phone use in adolescence: a cross-sectional studyInfluential
G. Martinotti et al. (2011) - 123 citations
- Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?Influential
J. He et al. (2014) - 119 citations
- Driving and telephoning: Relative accident risk when using hand-held and hands-free mobile phonesInfluential
A. Backer‐Grøndahl, F. Sagberg (2011) - 105 citations