8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

About the Science

This database represents decades of scientific research on the health effects of electromagnetic field exposure, curated by experts and made accessible to everyone.

Scientific Research Database

8,700 peer-reviewed studies from 4 independent research libraries

Why This Exists

The science on EMF health effects is clear-but it's buried in thousands of peer-reviewed papers scattered across academic journals. Most people will never read a single one.

That's a problem. Because these studies tell a story that contradicts the official narrative. They show biological effects at exposure levels far below what regulators say is safe. They document DNA damage, neurological effects, reproductive harm, and more-from the same wireless radiation we're all exposed to every day.

I built this database to make that research accessible. Not simplified or dumbed down-accessible. Every study here is the real thing: peer-reviewed, published in scientific journals, compiled from 4 independent research libraries.

This is the science they don't want you to see. Now you can see it for yourself.

The Numbers

8,700
Peer-Reviewed Studies
87.0%
Found Biological Effects
1988–2019
Research Period
Three Decades of Research - Regulatory Standards UnchangedAn area chart showing the cumulative growth of EMF research from 1988 to 2019, totaling 8,700 studies. The FCC last updated safety limits in 1996.Three Decades of Research - Regulatory Standards Unchanged02,4044,807Studies19881990200020102019FCC limits last updated (1996)8,700

Research has accelerated dramatically, but FCC safety limits haven't changed since 1996.

Studies by Measurement Type

The database includes studies across all major types of EMF exposure, from SAR measurements used for cell phones to magnetic and electric field studies from power lines and appliances.

Our Research Libraries

This database compiles studies from 4 independent research libraries, each curated by scientists and researchers specializing in EMF health effects.

BioInitiative Report

An independent scientific review compiled by 29 expert researchers from Columbia University, University of Washington, Karolinska Institute, and leading universities worldwide. Meet the scientists.

SafeRemr / Moskowitz

Curated by Dr. Joel Moskowitz at UC Berkeley School of Public Health, tracking the latest peer-reviewed research on wireless radiation health effects.

Powerwatch

A UK-based research organization maintaining one of the longest-running databases of EMF health research, with studies spanning decades.

Glaser Archive

The Zory Glaser archive preserves research reports compiled by Dr. Zorach Glaser for the U.S. Navy, documenting EMF biological effects dating back to 1971.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Key Conclusions from the BioInitiative Report

The report reviewed ~1,800 studies and found serious health concerns at exposure levels far below current safety standards. Here are the key findings:

DNA Damage

DNA acts as a "fractal antenna" for EMF

Studies show DNA is vulnerable to damage from electromagnetic fields at exposure levels far below current safety limits.

63% of RFR studies showed genotoxic effects
Reproductive Health

Sperm damaged at very low exposures

Human sperm shows DNA damage at exposure levels of 0.00034-0.07 uW/cm2 - levels common with cell phone use.

Sperm cannot repair DNA damage from cell phone radiation
Children at Risk

Children absorb more radiation

Children absorb more RF energy deeper into their brains than adults. In-utero exposure linked to behavioral problems.

25-49% increase in hyperactivity and conduct issues
Cancer

Consistent cancer risk pattern

Increased risk of glioma and acoustic neuroma with mobile/cordless phone use. WHO classified RFR as a possible carcinogen.

ELF-EMF classified as Group 1 carcinogen for childhood leukemia

The report concludes: Current FCC and ICNIRP safety limits are "a thousand times or more too high" to prevent biological effects. They recommend new standards based on the lowest observed effect levels, with special protections for children, pregnant women, and sensitive populations.

Dr. Martin Blank (1933–2018)

My father, Dr. Martin Blank, was a Professor at Columbia University for over 40 years. He dedicated his career to understanding how electromagnetic fields affect living cells.

He contributed two sections to the BioInitiative Report-on stress proteins and on DNA damage-synthesizing hundreds of studies into clear conclusions about the mechanisms by which EMF causes biological harm.

In 2014, we co-authored Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation, bringing decades of research to a general audience. It was his way of making sure the science didn't stay locked in academic journals.

He passed away in 2018, but his work lives on in every study in this database. This is his legacy-made accessible to everyone who wants to understand the truth about EMF.

About R Blank

I'm R Blank, CEO of Shield Your Body and the curator of this database. I've spent years working alongside my father and other EMF researchers, translating complex science into practical knowledge.

I hold an MBA and taught digital communications at USC's Viterbi School of Engineering. But my real education came from growing up around my father's research-dinner table conversations about stress proteins, DNA damage, and why the government's safety standards were decades out of date.

This database is my contribution to continuing that work. It takes the same research my father spent his career on and puts it in your hands-searchable, filterable, and explained in plain English.

Methodology

Source: Studies are compiled from 4 independent research libraries - the BioInitiative Report, Powerwatch, SafeRemr/Moskowitz, and the Glaser Archive - each curated by scientists specializing in bioelectromagnetics research.

Selection criteria: Studies must be peer-reviewed and published in scientific journals. Each library's curators selected studies based on scientific merit, not to confirm any particular conclusion.

Study classification: Studies are organized by the type of data they provide:

  • Studies with exposure data: 1,271 studies with quantified exposure levels. These can be used with the interactive tool to find research at your exposure level.
  • Studies with bioeffects only: 6,295 studies documenting biological effects without specific exposure data.
  • Null result studies: 1,134studies that found no bioeffects. Yes, we include null results - that's how honest science works.

AI-assisted summaries: Each study includes a plain-English summary and editorial commentary, generated with AI assistance and based on voice profiles from my published books. The underlying data-titles, authors, citations, and exposure levels-comes directly from the source material.

Further Reading

The research presented in this database is explored in depth in two books:

Ready to Explore the Research?