The PhoneGate Cell Phone EMF Radiation Scandal, Explained

The PhoneGate Cell Phone EMF Radiation Scandal, Explained

Between 2012 and 2016, France’s National Frequency Agency (ANFR) tested 379 different models of cell phones for their radiation emissions. Earlier this month, compelled by a court order, ANFR released the data they had collected. The result is now being called ‘PhoneGate’ and is gaining an increasing amount of attention.


What the PhoneGate Report Found

The French government found that 89% of the tested phones exceeded their reported radiation emission levels (SAR levels, or specific absorption rate)— some by up to 300%. That means these phones emitted up to four times the radiation the manufacturers claimed.

The Environmental Health Trust has summarized the data thusly:

the 5 biggest sources of EMF & how to protect yourself for free

Cut Your Exposure to Harmful EMF – Right Now

Grab your copy of my free guide with 5 ways to start.

French government tests on hundreds of cell phones reveal that in 2015, 9 out of 10 phones exceed the manufacturer’s reported radiation test levels when re-tested in positions where the phone is in contact with the body. The government had refused to disclose these test results until the court order.

That sounds pretty bad. But it’s even worse than that.

Not only do these phones emit more radiation than the manufacturers claim, these phones exceed legal limits of radiation emissions when held in contact with the human body.

The data from ANFR’s release is embedded below, at the end of this post.

Why Now?

Dr. Marc Arazi
Dr. Marc Arazi

ANFR released the data following the issuance of a court order. This was the result of legal action brought by Dr. Marc Arazi. His petition for the data was initially rejected by the French government, which is why he pursued legal action.

Arazi explains:

As a physician, I am deeply concerned about what this means for our health and especially the health of our children. People have a right to know that when cell phones are tested in ways people commonly use phones – such as in direct contact with their body – the values exceed current regulatory limits. This is a first victory for transparency in this industry scandal.

Why ‘PhoneGate’?

Dr. Arazi and others have dubbed this ‘PhoneGate’ because of the similarities to Volkswagen’s ‘Diesel Gate’ scandal, when it was shown that VW programmed their diesel cars to emit less pollution in labs than they do in real life usage. In real world usage, VW diesel’s emitted illegal levels of pollution.

As Dr. Devra Davis, head of the Environmental Health Trust, explains:

Volkswagen cars passed diesel emission tests when tested in laboratory conditions, but when the cars were driven on real roads, they emitted far more fumes. In the same way, every one of these cell phones ‘passed’ laboratory radiation SAR tests. These phones are legally considered compliant. However, when these phones are tested in the ways that people actually use them in real life, such as in your jeans pocket or bra, the amount of absorbed radiation emissions in our bodies violates the regulatory limits.

How PhoneGate is Different than Diesel Gate

With Diesel Gate, Volkswagen intentionally programmed their cars to emit less pollution when tested than they do in real life. Volkswagen rigged their products to intentionally deceive regulators.

PhoneGate, on the other hand, is more about the massive discrepancy between how phones are tested and how they are actually used in real life.

In other words, the cell phone makers aren’t deceiving the regulators. Instead, the regulators allow the cell phone makers to deceive the public, while still complying with the law. These tests simply do not match how people actually use phones, and the test results are not indicative of real life radiation exposures.

For example, in the United States phones can be tested at distances of 5 to 15mm (0.2 to 0.6 inches) away from the user’s head or body. But in real life, people who talk on their phone (without using the speakerphone or a headset) hold their phone immediately against their heads— not half an inch away. The same is true for those who carry their phones in their bras or pockets.

So the scandal here isn’t that the manufacturers are lying– it’s that the tests are rigged to show “safer” levels of radiation emissions and human absorption than we experience in real life.

That’s the problem.

For more details on Phonegate, check out the data released by ANFR.

Some Updates

Since I first wrote this post in 2017, there have been some newsworthy updates.

Peer-Reviewed Study of Data

In February 2019, Professor Om Gandhi published a peer-reviewed paper in which he examined the ANFR Phonegate data. Prof. Gandhi found that the phones in the Phonegate data can emit 11 times more than the US FCC limit and 3 times over French limits in 9 out of 10 phones tested.

13 Updates and Recalls

In April 2019, it was announced that 13 different models of phones were either updated, or recalled from the market entirely, based on the Phonegate data.

Here’s the summary of what happened with those 13 different models.

Cell phoneSAR trunk measuredManufacturer decisionSAR trunk measured after update
Orange HAPI2.1 W/kgWithdrawal from market, recall of models soldNon applicable
NEFFOS  X1 TP9022.52 W/kgWithdrawal from market, recall of models soldNon applicable
Huawei Honor 82.11 W/kgSoftware update1.45 W/kg
Echo Star Plus2.05 W/kgSoftware update1.41 W/kg
Alcatel Pixie 4-6”2.04 W/kgSoftware update1.58 W/kg
Wiko Tommy2
Bouygues Telecom
2.46 W/kgSoftware update1.66 W/kg
Hisense F232.13 W/kgSoftware update1.46 W/kg
Wiko View2.44 W/kgSoftware update1.34 W/kg
Archos access 503.01 W/kgSoftware update1.36 W/kg
LOGICOM M BOT 692.81 W/kgSoftware update1.51 W/kg
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5SAR head measured
2.08 W/kg
Software updateSAR head after update 0.356 W/kg
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S2.94 W/kgSoftware update1.42 W/kg
Nokia 52.24 W/kgSoftware update1.81 W/kg
Nokia 32.37 W/kgSoftware update1.64 W/kg
the 5 biggest sources of EMF & how to protect yourself for free

Cut Your Exposure to Harmful EMF – Right Now

Grab your copy of my free guide with 5 ways to start.

Related Articles

About the Author

Have a Question?

I take pride in designing great, effective products, based on real, measurable science – AND taking the time to ensure that each and every one of you has the information you need to understand EMF and make informed decisions.

So if you have a question, just email me and ask.


R Blank

Want to learn how you can test EMF at home?​

Good. Grab your copy of my free guide with everything you need to know about home EMF testing.​

Want to Slash Your Exposure to Harmful EMF?

Good. Download my FREE GUIDE with the 5 top free ways to start right now.

Cut Your Exposure to Harmful EMF – Right Now

Grab your copy of my free guide with 5 ways to start.