6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment.

Bioeffects Seen

Christ A, Chavannes N, Nikoloski N, Gerber HU, Pokovic K, Kuster N. · 2005

View Original Abstract
Share:

The numerical and experimental results compare well and confirm that the applied SAR assessment methods constitute a conservative approach.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The study aimed to investigate a numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment. The phantom was compared to a homogeneous Generic Head Phantom and three high-resolution anatomical head models for SAR assessment. Head phantoms were exposed to a generic mobile phone with different antenna types and a commercial mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz, and average peak SAR was measured experimentally and numerically.

Why This Matters

The numerical and experimental results compare well. The applied SAR assessment methods constitute a conservative approach.

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment.

This phantom is compared to a homogeneous Generic Head Phantom and three high resolution anatomical ...

The numerical and experimental results compare well and confirm that the applied SAR assessment meth...

Cite This Study
Christ A, Chavannes N, Nikoloski N, Gerber HU, Pokovic K, Kuster N. (2005). A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment. Bioelectromagnetics. 26(2):125-137, 2005.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_2005_a_numerical_and_experimental_1983,
  author = {Christ A and Chavannes N and Nikoloski N and Gerber HU and Pokovic K and Kuster N.},
  title = {A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment.},
  year = {2005},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15672370/},
}

Cited By (55 papers)

Quick Questions About This Study

The study aimed to investigate a numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment.
The phantom was compared to a homogeneous Generic Head Phantom and three high-resolution anatomical head models for SAR assessment.
Head phantoms were exposed to a generic mobile phone with different antenna types and a commercial mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz.
Average peak SAR was evaluated using both experimental DASY3 near-field scanner and numerical FDTD simulations.
The numerical and experimental results compare well and confirm that the applied SAR assessment methods constitute a conservative approach.