Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Meta-analysis of mobile phone use and intracranial tumors.
Lahkola A, Tokola K, Auvinen A. · 2006
View Original AbstractEarly mobile phone users showed no increased brain tumor risk after 5+ years, but modern smartphone risks remain unclear.
Plain English Summary
Researchers analyzed 12 studies involving 2,780 people with brain tumors to determine if mobile phone use increases cancer risk. They found no significant increase in brain tumor risk for people who used mobile phones for more than 5 years, with odds ratios (risk measures) hovering around 1.0 for all tumor types studied. This suggests that at least for the first 5-10 years of mobile phone use, the risk of developing brain tumors does not appear to increase substantially.
Why This Matters
This 2006 meta-analysis represents one of the earlier comprehensive attempts to pool data on mobile phone use and brain cancer risk. While the findings suggest no increased risk for short to medium-term use, several important limitations must be considered. The study period captures mostly analog and early digital phone users, with exposure levels and usage patterns dramatically different from today's smartphone era. Most critically, the analysis focuses on users with 5+ years of exposure, which may be insufficient to detect cancers with longer latency periods. The science demonstrates that brain tumors can take 10-20 years or more to develop after initial exposure. What this means for you is that while these results are reassuring for early mobile phone technology, they don't necessarily predict risks from today's more powerful devices used for hours daily, often held directly against the head. The reality is we need longer-term studies tracking heavier users of modern smartphones to fully understand cancer risks.
Study Details
A summary of epidemiologic evidence regarding the effect of mobile phone use on intracranial tumor risk was obtained by means of a meta-analysis.
Reports of published studies on mobile phone use and intracranial tumors were sought. Altogether 12 ...
Twelve studies with 2780 cases gave a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.98 [95% confidence interval (95% C...
The totality of evidence does not indicate a substantially increased risk of intracranial tumors from mobile phone use for a period of at least 5 years.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_2006_metaanalysis_of_mobile_phone_3174,
author = {Lahkola A and Tokola K and Auvinen A.},
title = {Meta-analysis of mobile phone use and intracranial tumors.},
year = {2006},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16804618/},
}Cited By (75 papers)
- Mobile phones and head tumours. The discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epidemiological studies - how do they arise?Influential
A. Levis et al. (2011) - 56 citations
- Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve?Influential
A. Auvinen et al. (2006) - 36 citations
- An evaluation of self‐reported mobile phone use compared to billing records among a group of engineers and scientistsInfluential
M. Shum et al. (2011) - 26 citations
- Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Adult Primary Brain Tumours: Quality Assessment of Existing Systematic Reviews, Followed by Updated Analyses and De-Novo SynthesesInfluential
Pauline Quach (2013) - 1 citations
- Environmental and Occupational Causes of Cancer: New Evidence 2005-2007
R. Clapp et al. (2008) - 355 citations
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: increased risk associated with use for ⩾10 years
L. Hardell et al. (2007) - 247 citations
- Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries
A. Lahkola et al. (2007) - 216 citations
- Mobile phone use and risk of brain neoplasms and other cancers: prospective study.
V. Benson et al. (2013) - 184 citations
- WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields
E. van Deventer et al. (2011) - 183 citations