8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Cancer & Tumors

A briefing memorandum: What we know, can infer, and don’t yet know about impacts from thermal and non-thermal non-ionizing radiation to birds and other wildlife — for public release

Bioeffects Seen

Manville, A. · 2016

View Original Abstract
Share:

Insufficient information to determine key finding.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This briefing memorandum by Manville examines what is known and unknown about the impacts of thermal and non-thermal non-ionizing radiation on birds and other wildlife. The study appears to be a review and synthesis document addressing current scientific understanding, areas of inference, and knowledge gaps regarding electromagnetic field effects on wildlife.

Why This Matters

This document is a briefing memorandum rather than a primary research study, suggesting it serves as a synthesis of existing literature and expert assessment. The organism field listing 'human' appears to be a data entry error, as the title clearly focuses on birds and other wildlife as the subjects of concern.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Manville, A. (2016). A briefing memorandum: What we know, can infer, and don’t yet know about impacts from thermal and non-thermal non-ionizing radiation to birds and other wildlife — for public release.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_briefing_memorandum_what_we_know_can_infer_and_dont_yet_know_about_impacts_from_thermal_and_non_thermal_non_ionizing_radiation_to_birds_and_other_wildlife_for_public_release_ce4812,
  author = {Manville and A.},
  title = {A briefing memorandum: What we know, can infer, and don’t yet know about impacts from thermal and non-thermal non-ionizing radiation to birds and other wildlife — for public release},
  year = {2016},
  
  url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20693976},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Long-term mobile phone users show significantly increased rates of brain tumors (glioma, acoustic neuroma, meningioma), parotid gland tumors, and seminoma. Risk increases range from 1.3 to 6.1 times higher than non-users, especially for people who consistently use phones on the same side of their head.
Yes, two epidemiological studies found significantly increased cancer incidence in populations living close to mobile phone base stations compared to people living in more distant areas. This suggests that even lower-level chronic exposures from cell towers carry measurable health risks.
Laboratory studies show low-intensity microwave radiation causes reactive oxygen species overproduction, heat shock protein expression, DNA damage, and programmed cell death (apoptosis). These biological effects occur at power levels far below those that cause tissue heating.
No, current safety limits are based solely on preventing tissue heating effects. The review argues these thermal-based standards are inadequate because they ignore the significant metabolic changes and DNA damage that occur from non-thermal radiation exposure at much lower power levels.
Ipsilateral use means consistently holding the phone to the same side of your head. This pattern shows the strongest cancer risk increases, with odds ratios up to 6.1 times higher, because the same brain tissue receives repeated radiation exposure over years of use.