6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

A REPORT ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SURVEYS OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS

Measurement survey

C. Eugene Moss, William E. Murray, Wordie H. Parr, Ph.D., Jacqueline Messite, M.D., Gerald J. Karches · 1977

Share:

Finding

The values obtained for x-ray, ultraviolet, visible, infrared, and radiofrequency radiation were considerably below current threshold limit values or standards.

In their words

“The values obtained for x-ray, ultraviolet, visible, infrared, and radiofrequency radiation were considerably below current threshold limit values or standards.”

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 10 MHz to 525 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 10 MHz to 525 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: approximately four months for the 35-year-old male and one year for the 29-year-old male

Cite This Study
C. Eugene Moss, William E. Murray, Wordie H. Parr, Ph.D., Jacqueline Messite, M.D., Gerald J. Karches (1977). A REPORT ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SURVEYS OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_report_on_electromagnetic_radiation_surveys_of_video_display_terminals_g6064,
  author = {C. Eugene Moss and William E. Murray and Wordie H. Parr and Ph.D. and Jacqueline Messite and M.D. and Gerald J. Karches},
  title = {A REPORT ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SURVEYS OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS},
  year = {1977},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.