8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

A Review of Selected Biological Effects and Dosimetric Data Useful for Development of Radiofrequency Safety Standards for Human Exposure

Bioeffects Seen

R.A. Tell, F. Harlen · 1979

Share:

RF safety standards may be 10 times too high for frequencies below 1 GHz where human bodies absorb significantly more energy.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1979 government review examined how radiofrequency radiation heats human tissue to establish safe exposure limits. The analysis found that the widely-used 10 mW/cm² safety standard provides adequate protection above 1 GHz frequencies, but may be too high by up to 10 times for lower frequencies where the body absorbs more energy.

Why This Matters

This foundational safety review reveals a critical gap in our RF exposure standards that persists today. The science demonstrates that frequencies below 1 GHz create body resonances that dramatically increase energy absorption, yet our safety limits don't adequately account for this physics. What this means for you: many wireless devices operate in these problematic frequency ranges, including cell towers, WiFi, and older cell phones. The reality is that thermal-based safety standards ignore non-thermal biological effects entirely, focusing only on tissue heating. This 45-year-old analysis already questioned whether our exposure limits were protective enough, yet regulatory agencies have largely maintained the same thermal-only approach despite mounting evidence of biological effects at non-heating levels.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
R.A. Tell, F. Harlen (1979). A Review of Selected Biological Effects and Dosimetric Data Useful for Development of Radiofrequency Safety Standards for Human Exposure.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_review_of_selected_biological_effects_and_dosimetric_data_useful_for_developme_g4021,
  author = {R.A. Tell and F. Harlen},
  title = {A Review of Selected Biological Effects and Dosimetric Data Useful for Development of Radiofrequency Safety Standards for Human Exposure},
  year = {1979},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Below 1 GHz, human bodies experience resonance effects that dramatically increase energy absorption. This means the same power level causes much more heating and potential biological effects compared to higher frequencies where energy passes through more easily.
The 10 mW/cm² limit is a widely-used RF exposure standard in Western countries. This study found it adequate for frequencies above 1 GHz but potentially too high by 10 times for lower frequencies due to increased body absorption.
The study proposed that occupational RF exposure should not increase core body temperature by more than 1°C. For the general public, the thermal load should cause no more than insignificant temperature increases to maintain safety margins.
Some body tissues aren't adapted to dissipate heat effectively. Local temperature increases near protein denaturation limits can occur even when core temperature rises less than 1°C, requiring separate protection beyond whole-body averaging.
The study concluded that averaging RF exposure over just 0.1 hours (6 minutes) was unjustifiably short. This brief timeframe may not adequately protect against biological effects that develop over longer exposure periods.