8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF ULTRA-HIGH-FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY TECHNIQUES

Bioeffects Seen

Robert E. Wimmer · 1954

Share:

Early 1954 research established measurement standards for ultra-high-frequency radiation that we still rely on today.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1954 technical report surveyed and analyzed measurement techniques for ultra-high-frequency electromagnetic radiation dosimetry. The research examined methods for quantifying radiation exposure levels from UHF sources, which operate at frequencies between 300 MHz and 3 GHz. This work helped establish foundational measurement standards for assessing human exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Why This Matters

This 1954 research represents early scientific recognition that we needed standardized ways to measure human exposure to ultra-high-frequency radiation. What makes this particularly relevant today is that UHF frequencies (300 MHz to 3 GHz) encompass many of our most common wireless technologies, including cell phones, WiFi, and Bluetooth. The science demonstrates that even 70 years ago, researchers understood the importance of accurate dosimetry for assessing biological effects.

The reality is that proper measurement techniques remain critical today as we're exposed to UHF radiation at levels far exceeding what existed in 1954. This foundational work on dosimetry standards helped establish the measurement protocols we still use to assess whether our daily exposure to cell towers, smartphones, and wireless networks stays within safety guidelines.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 2600 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 2600 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To examine for feasibility and carry through primary development of various systems of UHF field measuring and field integrating devices to be used as tools in biological research conducted by various parties in the U.S. Air Force

Experimental work involving construction and testing of several types of simple and inexpensive ultr...

Several power flux measuring devices were constructed and tested including: neon photometer (linear ...

The folded dipole half-wave rectifier system was determined to be the most satisfactory and simplest for UHF power flux measurement. Chemical electrochemical dosimetry using visible color change reactions was recommended as most practical for economy, convenience and speed. Further work should focus on low level continuous wave measuring and dosimetry devices, and pulsed radiation sources for radar sets.

Cite This Study
Robert E. Wimmer (1954). A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF ULTRA-HIGH-FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY TECHNIQUES.
Show BibTeX
@article{a_survey_and_analysis_of_ultra_high_frequency_measurement_of_dosimetry_technique_g5559,
  author = {Robert E. Wimmer},
  title = {A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF ULTRA-HIGH-FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY TECHNIQUES},
  year = {1954},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Ultra-high-frequency radiation spans 300 MHz to 3 GHz, covering frequencies used today by cell phones, WiFi, Bluetooth, and many wireless communication systems that didn't exist in 1954.
Researchers recognized the need for consistent, accurate methods to measure radiation exposure levels as UHF technologies emerged, establishing the foundation for modern safety standards and exposure guidelines.
The measurement techniques developed in this research became the basis for current methods used to assess whether our exposure to cell phones, WiFi, and wireless devices meets safety standards.
UHF radiation required specialized measurement equipment and techniques because these frequencies behave differently than lower frequency radiation, penetrating tissue in unique ways that needed accurate quantification.
No, 1954 UHF exposure levels were minimal compared to today's constant exposure from multiple wireless devices, making accurate dosimetry measurement techniques even more critical now.