6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

ADVANCES IN SHORTWAVE THERAPY

Bioeffects Seen

Manfred R. M. Blashy · 1970

Share:

Finding

The four casuistically discussed cases are typical for the series of 40 cases. All reacted in like manner to diapulse. Differences existed only in the number of treatments or their duration as well as the length of the radiation series. The results are summarized in Table 1. Acute infections react quicker than chronic ones, namely, in 7.5 diapulse treatments as against 25. The retreat too is understandably quicker, 5.5 days as against 25. Superficial infections react quicker than deeplying ones.

In their words

“The four casuistically discussed cases are typical for the series of 40 cases. All reacted in like manner to diapulse. Differences existed only in the number of treatments or their duration as well as the length of the radiation series. The results are summarized in Table 1. Acute infections react quicker than chronic ones, namely, in 7.5 diapulse treatments as against 25. The retreat too is understandably quicker, 5.5 days as against 25. Superficial infections react quicker than deeplying ones.”

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 600 kHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 600 kHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: 10 minutes for acute infections, 15 minutes for chronic infections

Cite This Study
Manfred R. M. Blashy (1970). ADVANCES IN SHORTWAVE THERAPY.
Show BibTeX
@article{advances_in_shortwave_therapy_g5926,
  author = {Manfred R. M. Blashy},
  title = {ADVANCES IN SHORTWAVE THERAPY},
  year = {1970},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.