6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

ALTERATIONS IN PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION AND TISSUE TEMPERATURE FOLLOWING LOCAL APPLICATION OF SHORT WAVE DIATHERMY

Bioeffects Seen

Herman J. Flax, Ruth N. Miller, Steven M. Horvath · 1949

Share:

1949 study of 10 men found that local shortwave diathermy to the thigh raised tissue temperature but produced four different types of peripheral blood flow response.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1949 study examined how local shortwave diathermy (a medical heating device using radio frequencies) affected tissue temperature and peripheral blood flow in 10 normal men aged 22 to 35. Twenty minutes of treatment raised thigh surface temperature by a mean of 3.1 degrees. Four types of blood flow response were observed: no vasodilation in the distal area (3 subjects), gradual vasoconstriction (3), marked vasodilation (2), and no change during application with an increase occurring later (2). The authors noted that earlier reports of diathermy's effect on blood flow disagreed.

Why This Matters

This 1949 study shows how inconsistent the blood flow response to local heating could be. Short wave diathermy raised the temperature of both superficial and deep thigh tissue, yet the 10 subjects showed four different peripheral blood flow responses. The authors concluded that changes in blood flow are not necessarily a consequence of changes in deep-tissue temperature, and suggested that earlier reports of increased flow may reflect a secondary response to a general rise in body temperature. Rectal temperature showed no general rise in this study.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

graphPage 3 - AI-described figure: Figure 1 illustrates temperature measurements before and after short-wave diathermy treatment to the thigh, showing a cooling curve with time.
graphPage 4 - AI-described figure: Figure 4. Temperature measurements before and after short wave diathermy showing cooling curves for various body parts.
chartPage 5 - AI-described figure: Figure 4 illustrates spontaneous variations in blood flow in the toe, showing low amplitudes before and after heating of the thigh.
chartPage 6 - AI-described figure: Illustrations indicating that marked vasoconstriction observed in control observations was completely relieved after short wave diathermy. The most marked changes were observed approximately one-half hour after treatment.
chartPage 7 - AI-described figure: Figures showing changes in response magnitude over time during and after a treatment.
Cite This Study
Herman J. Flax, Ruth N. Miller, Steven M. Horvath (1949). ALTERATIONS IN PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION AND TISSUE TEMPERATURE FOLLOWING LOCAL APPLICATION OF SHORT WAVE DIATHERMY.
Show BibTeX
@article{alterations_in_peripheral_circulation_and_tissue_temperature_following_local_app_g3883,
  author = {Herman J. Flax and Ruth N. Miller and Steven M. Horvath},
  title = {ALTERATIONS IN PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION AND TISSUE TEMPERATURE FOLLOWING LOCAL APPLICATION OF SHORT WAVE DIATHERMY},
  year = {1949},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Shortwave diathermy is a medical heating treatment. In this study, heat was generated in the right thigh by four turns of cable connected to the short wave diathermy machine for twenty minutes, and the induction coil technique raised the temperature of both superficial and deep tissues.
Four types of response were observed in 10 subjects. Three showed no vasodilation in the distal area, 3 showed gradual vasoconstriction, 2 showed marked vasodilation, and 2 showed no change in blood flow during application with an increase occurring later.
Temperature rose a mean of 3.1 degrees at the thigh surface, slightly more at a depth of 1 inch, and less at a depth of 1 1/4 inches. The maximum depth of penetration with the coil technique appeared to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 inch to 1 1/4 inches.
Earlier experiments disagreed. Kemp, Paul and Hines found in anesthetized animals that heating muscle by approximately 4 degrees C. failed to increase blood flow and frequently decreased it, while Wakim and co-workers reported a mean increase of 69 per cent using the same type of preparation and the same general technic.
No, there was no general rise in body temperature. All rectal temperatures remained constant, in general showing a tendency to fall slightly, with a mean change of 0.05 degree F for all of the subjects.