8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

An Analysis Of Radiofrequency And Microwave Absorption Data With Consideration Of Thermal Safety Standards

Bioeffects Seen

Richard A. Tell · 1978

Share:

This foundational 1978 EPA analysis established thermal-based RF safety standards that remain largely unchanged despite decades of non-thermal research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1978 EPA technical report analyzed radiofrequency and microwave absorption data to evaluate thermal safety standards for human exposure. The study examined how RF and microwave energy is absorbed by biological tissue and assessed whether existing safety guidelines adequately protect against heating effects. This represents early government recognition that RF/microwave exposure needed systematic safety evaluation.

Why This Matters

This EPA report from 1978 marks a pivotal moment when federal agencies first began systematically analyzing RF and microwave absorption data for safety purposes. The reality is that this early work focused exclusively on thermal effects - the heating of tissue - which became the foundation for our current safety standards. What this means for you is that today's exposure limits are still based on this nearly 50-year-old thermal-only approach, despite decades of research showing biological effects occur well below heating thresholds.

The science demonstrates that our bodies absorb RF and microwave energy from sources like cell phones, WiFi routers, and smart meters at levels that don't cause heating but may still trigger cellular responses. This 1978 analysis helped establish the specific absorption rate (SAR) concept that regulators still use today, yet it ignored the growing evidence of non-thermal biological effects that we now know occur at much lower exposure levels.

Finding

A method of specifying safety standard limits based on the electromagnetic field energy density rather than the plane wave, free-space equivalent power density is presented. The analysis reveals a particularly important resonance frequency range, 10 MHz < f <1000 MHz, in which RF and MW absorption may lead to whole body thermal loads several times the whole body basal metabolic rate for exposures equal to the present safety standard in use in the United States.

In their words

A method of specifying safety standard limits based on the electromagnetic field energy density rather than the plane wave, free-space equivalent power density is presented. The analysis reveals a particularly important resonance frequency range, 10 MHz < f <1000 MHz, in which RF and MW absorption may lead to whole body thermal loads several times the whole body basal metabolic rate for exposures equal to the present safety standard in use in the United States.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 10 MHz to 1000 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 10 MHz to 1000 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To analyze existing radiofrequency and microwave absorption data to examine the frequency dependent phenomenon of biological tissue heating and determine exposure field intensities associated with various levels of RF and MW induced thermal loading.

The analysis examines the absorption of nonionizing radiation as a thermal load on body tissues, usi...

The analysis reveals a particularly important resonance frequency range, 10 MHz < f <1000 MHz, in wh...

The analysis demonstrates that RF and MW absorption in the frequency range of 10 MHz to 1000 MHz can lead to whole body thermal loads several times the whole body basal metabolic rate for exposures equal to the present safety standard in use in the United States. The analysis provides a method of specifying safety standard limits based on electromagnetic field energy density rather than plane wave, free-space equivalent power density.

Cite This Study
Richard A. Tell (1978). An Analysis Of Radiofrequency And Microwave Absorption Data With Consideration Of Thermal Safety Standards.
Show BibTeX
@article{an_analysis_of_radiofrequency_and_microwave_absorption_data_with_consideration_o_g4421,
  author = {Richard A. Tell},
  title = {An Analysis Of Radiofrequency And Microwave Absorption Data With Consideration Of Thermal Safety Standards},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The EPA analyzed how radiofrequency and microwave energy heats biological tissue, establishing absorption rate measurements that became the foundation for current safety standards focused exclusively on preventing tissue heating rather than other biological effects.
Current RF safety limits are still based on this nearly 50-year-old thermal-only approach, despite extensive research showing biological effects occur at exposure levels well below those that cause tissue heating.
This analysis helped develop the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) concept, which measures how much RF energy tissue absorbs per kilogram. SAR limits based on thermal effects remain the primary safety standard today.
No, this analysis focused exclusively on thermal effects and tissue heating. The EPA did not consider biological responses that might occur at lower, non-heating exposure levels that research has since documented.
Today's ubiquitous wireless devices expose us to RF levels unimaginable in 1978, yet safety standards remain based on this era's thermal-only analysis rather than current understanding of biological effects.