8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

AN OVERVIEW OF UNITED STATES ACTIVITIES FOR NONIONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SAFETY

Bioeffects Seen

Howard E. Clark

Share:

U.S. EMF safety oversight remains fragmented across multiple agencies using outdated standards that ignore non-thermal biological effects.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This technical report by Howard Clark examines United States government activities and policies related to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (EMF) safety programs. The document reviews how federal agencies coordinate radiation protection efforts for the general public and workers exposed to EMF sources like radio waves, microwaves, and power lines.

Why This Matters

This overview represents a critical examination of how the U.S. government approaches EMF safety - a system that has remained largely unchanged for decades despite mounting scientific evidence of health risks. The reality is that our federal radiation protection framework was designed in an era when wireless technology was minimal and exposure levels were a fraction of what we experience today. While this report likely details the bureaucratic structure of agencies like the FCC, EPA, and OSHA, it also highlights a fundamental problem: these agencies continue to rely on outdated thermal-only safety standards that ignore the biological effects occurring at power levels far below what causes tissue heating. What this means for you is that the current regulatory approach treats your daily EMF exposure from smartphones, WiFi, and other wireless devices as inherently safe, when independent research increasingly suggests otherwise.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagram extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 6 - AI-described figure: A flowchart illustrating elements of a program on biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (BENER), including steps from determining population exposure to recommending control measures.
p. 6 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 0 to 300 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 0 to 300 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To outline the coordinated federal activities related to biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (0-300GHz) and to identify exposure limits and standards for both general and occupational populations.

Cite This Study
Howard E. Clark (n.d.). AN OVERVIEW OF UNITED STATES ACTIVITIES FOR NONIONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SAFETY.
Show BibTeX
@article{an_overview_of_united_states_activities_for_nonionizing_electromagnetic_radiatio_g3893,
  author = {Howard E. Clark},
  title = {AN OVERVIEW OF UNITED STATES ACTIVITIES FOR NONIONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SAFETY},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Multiple federal agencies share EMF oversight responsibilities, including the FCC for device emissions, EPA for environmental exposure, OSHA for workplace safety, and FDA for medical devices. This fragmented approach often creates regulatory gaps.
Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation includes radio waves, microwaves, and power frequency fields that don't have enough energy to remove electrons from atoms. However, these EMF sources can still cause biological effects through non-thermal mechanisms.
U.S. EMF exposure limits are generally less protective than many other countries. While the U.S. focuses primarily on preventing tissue heating, nations like Switzerland and Italy have adopted more precautionary limits based on biological effects.
The report likely covers federal monitoring programs, exposure assessment methods, public education efforts, research coordination, and regulatory enforcement activities related to EMF safety across different government agencies and departments.
Government safety programs directly influence the EMF exposure limits for devices you use daily. Understanding these activities helps consumers recognize regulatory limitations and make informed decisions about personal EMF protection measures.