8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Cardiovascular

Anti-hijacking Efforts and Cardiac Pacemakers—Report of a Clinical Study

Bioeffects Seen

Oliver C. Hood, John M. Keshishian, Nicholas P. D. Smyth, Edward Podolak, Archie A. Hoffman, Norman R. Baker · 1972

Share:

Airport security systems in 1972 were found to interfere with cardiac pacemakers, establishing real-world EMF medical device risks.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1972 study examined how airport metal detectors and weapons screening systems could interfere with cardiac pacemakers in passengers. The research identified electromagnetic interference risks that could potentially disrupt pacemaker function during security screening. This was among the first clinical investigations into EMF effects on implanted medical devices.

Why This Matters

This pioneering 1972 research represents a watershed moment in recognizing how electromagnetic fields from security equipment could interfere with life-sustaining medical devices. The study emerged during aviation's early adoption of anti-hijacking measures, when airports began installing metal detectors and screening systems that generated electromagnetic fields strong enough to disrupt cardiac pacemakers.

What makes this research particularly significant is its real-world context. Unlike laboratory studies, this examined actual interference occurring in airport environments where people with pacemakers encountered security screening daily. The findings helped establish protocols that airports still follow today, requiring alternative screening methods for passengers with implanted devices. This study demonstrates how EMF interference isn't just a theoretical concern but a documented medical reality that required immediate policy changes to protect vulnerable populations.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Oliver C. Hood, John M. Keshishian, Nicholas P. D. Smyth, Edward Podolak, Archie A. Hoffman, Norman R. Baker (1972). Anti-hijacking Efforts and Cardiac Pacemakers—Report of a Clinical Study.
Show BibTeX
@article{anti_hijacking_efforts_and_cardiac_pacemakers_report_of_a_clinical_study_g94,
  author = {Oliver C. Hood and John M. Keshishian and Nicholas P. D. Smyth and Edward Podolak and Archie A. Hoffman and Norman R. Baker},
  title = {Anti-hijacking Efforts and Cardiac Pacemakers—Report of a Clinical Study},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, this 1972 study documented that airport weapons detection systems could disrupt pacemaker function through electromagnetic interference. This research led to alternative screening protocols for passengers with implanted medical devices that airports still use today.
This clinical study from 1972 was among the first to examine how anti-hijacking security equipment could interfere with cardiac pacemakers. The research emerged as airports began installing metal detectors and screening systems during aviation's early anti-hijacking efforts.
The 1972 study addressed a pressing safety concern as airports installed new electromagnetic screening equipment during anti-hijacking efforts. Researchers needed to determine if these security systems could dangerously interfere with life-sustaining cardiac pacemakers in passengers.
Security screening equipment generates electromagnetic fields that can disrupt the electronic circuits in cardiac pacemakers and other implanted devices. This 1972 research helped identify the specific interference patterns that could cause medical device malfunctions.
The research findings led airports to develop alternative screening methods for passengers with pacemakers and other implanted medical devices. These protocols help prevent electromagnetic interference while maintaining security screening effectiveness, policies still followed today.