6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION

Bioeffects Seen

Joseph M. Lary, David L. Conover, William E. Murray

Share:

The authors concluded that adverse biological effects in animals appear to have a threshold at a specific absorption rate of about 2 W/kg.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The authors reviewed and critically evaluated the radiofrequency biological effects literature through 1982. The review indicated that there appears to be a threshold for adverse biological effects in animals at a specific absorption rate of about 2 W/kg. At SARs between 1.8 and 4.5 W/kg, adverse effects included death, temperature increases exceeding 3%, hemorrhagic lesions, staggering and spasms in chicks, and extreme agitation in dogs. At SARs below 1.8 W/kg no clearly adverse effects were reported, but measurable temperature increases and physiological changes occurred in the 0.17 to 1.8 W/kg range. At SARs below 0.17 W/kg no temperature increases were reported and most effects involved calcium efflux or blood-brain barrier permeability.

Why This Matters

The lowest SAR producing a clearly adverse effect was 1.87 W/kg in bantam chicks, which showed staggering, muscular flaccidity or collapse, tonic or clonic spasms, and avoidance of the radiation beam. Death was reported in rats exposed for 139 minutes at 3.6 W/kg, in rabbits for 2 hours at 4.05 W/kg, and in dogs for 2 to 3 hours at 5.94 W/kg, all resulting from excessive hyperthermia. In the 0.17 to 1.8 W/kg range, rectal temperature increases of 1.0 to 1.7 degrees were reported in monkeys and rabbits, along with changes in behavior, blood chemistry, hormone levels, and brain activity. The authors noted that increased calcium efflux from the brain has no known significance to animal health, and increased blood-brain barrier permeability has been difficult to replicate at low exposure levels and may be an experimental artifact.

Finding

SEVERAL ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AT SARS BETWEEN 1.8 AND 4.5 W/KG INCLUDING DEATH (RATS AND RABBITS); RECTAL TEMPERATURE INCREASES EXCEEDING 3% (MONKEYS, DOGS); HEMORRHAGIC LESIONS, OTHER TISSUE LESIONS, AND TUBULAR NEPHROSIS (RABBITS); STAGGERING, MUSCULAR FLACCIDITY AND COLLAPSE, AND SPASMS OF THE LEGS AND WINGS (CHICKS); AND EXTREME AGITATION, IMPAIRED LOCOMOTION, AND EXHAUSTION (DOGS).

In their words

“SEVERAL ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AT SARS BETWEEN 1.8 AND 4.5 W/KG INCLUDING DEATH (RATS AND RABBITS); RECTAL TEMPERATURE INCREASES EXCEEDING 3% (MONKEYS, DOGS); HEMORRHAGIC LESIONS, OTHER TISSUE LESIONS, AND TUBULAR NEPHROSIS (RABBITS); STAGGERING, MUSCULAR FLACCIDITY AND COLLAPSE, AND SPASMS OF THE LEGS AND WINGS (CHICKS); AND EXTREME AGITATION, IMPAIRED LOCOMOTION, AND EXHAUSTION (DOGS).”
Cite This Study
Joseph M. Lary, David L. Conover, William E. Murray (n.d.). ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION.
Show BibTeX
@article{assessment_of_the_biological_effects_of_radiofrequency_radiation_g4289,
  author = {Joseph M. Lary and David L. Conover and William E. Murray},
  title = {ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The authors concluded that the threshold for adverse biological effects in experimental animals is approximately 2 W/kg specific absorption rate.
Adverse effects included death in rats and rabbits, rectal temperature increases exceeding 3% in monkeys and dogs, hemorrhagic lesions and tubular nephrosis in rabbits, staggering and spasms in chicks, and extreme agitation and exhaustion in dogs.
No clearly adverse effects were reported at SARs below 1.8 W/kg. However, measurable temperature increases and distinctive physiological and behavioral changes occurred in the 0.17 to 1.8 W/kg range.
No temperature increases were reported at SARs below 0.17 W/kg, and most exposures failed to produce any detectable effects. The few reported effects involved calcium efflux from the brain or increased blood-brain barrier permeability, which the authors considered of unknown health significance or possibly an artifact.
The lowest SAR producing a clearly adverse effect was 1.87 W/kg in bantam chicks, which showed staggering, muscular flaccidity or collapse, spasms of the legs and wings, and avoidance of the radiation beam.