8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

BIOEFFECTS OF NON-IONIZING ELECTRONIC PRODUCT RADIATION

Bioeffects Seen

W. A. Mills, Ph.D. · 1970

Share:

Scientists documented biological effects from electronic product radiation 50 years ago, establishing early foundation for EMF health research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1970 conference paper examined the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation from electronic products, covering ultraviolet, visible light, and infrared radiation. The research addressed public health concerns about everyday electronic devices that emit various forms of non-ionizing radiation. This represents early scientific recognition that electronic products could produce measurable biological effects.

Why This Matters

This 1970 research represents a pivotal moment in EMF science - the recognition that everyday electronic products produce biological effects through non-ionizing radiation. What makes this significant is the timing: scientists were already documenting bioeffects from electronic devices over 50 years ago, long before our current saturation with wireless technology. The study's focus on ultraviolet, visible light, and infrared radiation from electronic products shows that concerns about EMF bioeffects aren't new or fringe - they've been part of mainstream scientific discussion for decades. Today's exposure levels from smartphones, WiFi, and smart devices represent an exponential increase from what researchers were studying in 1970, yet the fundamental question remains the same: how do these ubiquitous electronic emissions affect human biology?

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To provide an overview of biological effects of non-ionizing radiation and highlight areas requiring further research

The available information on biological effects of non-ionizing radiation is difficult to interpret as to its meaning to public health problems. Many contradictions exist. This difficulty in interpretation can be overcome only by a research effort well-designed to answer specific questions. The research effort into the biological effects must be equalled by an effort in the dosimetry aspects of these problems.

Cite This Study
W. A. Mills, Ph.D. (1970). BIOEFFECTS OF NON-IONIZING ELECTRONIC PRODUCT RADIATION.
Show BibTeX
@article{bioeffects_of_non_ionizing_electronic_product_radiation_g3710,
  author = {W. A. Mills and Ph.D.},
  title = {BIOEFFECTS OF NON-IONIZING ELECTRONIC PRODUCT RADIATION},
  year = {1970},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The research examined non-ionizing radiation including ultraviolet, visible light, and infrared radiation emitted by electronic products. These represent different portions of the electromagnetic spectrum that electronic devices commonly produce during normal operation.
1970 marked early scientific recognition that everyday electronic products could produce measurable biological effects through radiation exposure. This was decades before widespread wireless technology, showing EMF health concerns have deep scientific roots.
Electronic devices in 1970 primarily emitted ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation. Today's devices add radiofrequency and microwave radiation through WiFi, Bluetooth, and cellular connections, creating much more complex exposure patterns.
The research specifically examined public health implications of bioeffects from electronic product radiation. This shows scientists were already considering population-wide health impacts from common electronic devices over five decades ago.
Yes, this paper established the scientific foundation that electronic products can produce biological effects through radiation exposure. Modern EMF research builds on these early findings while addressing today's dramatically increased exposure levels.