8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Biological Effects of Static and Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: An Overview of United States Literature

Bioeffects Seen

Richard D. Phillips, William T. Kaune · 1977

Share:

Scientists were documenting biological effects from power-frequency electromagnetic fields decades before wireless technology became widespread.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1977 technical report by Phillips and Kaune reviewed the existing United States scientific literature on biological effects from static and extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. The comprehensive review examined what was known at the time about how these fields affect living organisms, providing an early scientific foundation for understanding EMF health effects.

Why This Matters

This report represents a pivotal moment in EMF research history. In 1977, scientists were already documenting biological effects from the same types of electromagnetic fields we encounter daily from power lines, electrical wiring, and household appliances. The fact that researchers felt compelled to conduct this comprehensive literature review suggests there was already enough concerning evidence to warrant serious scientific attention.

What makes this particularly significant is the timing. This review preceded the explosion of wireless technology by decades, yet it focused on ELF fields that remain ubiquitous in our modern electrical infrastructure. The reality is that the scientific concern about EMF biological effects isn't new or driven by wireless technology fears. It has deep roots in decades of research into the fundamental electromagnetic fields that power our world.

Finding

Exposure to the electric field had no effect on reproductive ability. Body weights of the exposed and control mice did not differ. Gross and microscopic pathological studies made at the end of the experiment showed no relevant lesions. The only observed effect of electric field exposure was that the male progeny of the exposed animals had a lower body weight than male progeny of control animals. No differences were observed in the female progeny.

In their words

Exposure to the electric field had no effect on reproductive ability. Body weights of the exposed and control mice did not differ. Gross and microscopic pathological studies made at the end of the experiment showed no relevant lesions. The only observed effect of electric field exposure was that the male progeny of the exposed animals had a lower body weight than male progeny of control animals. No differences were observed in the female progeny.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 60 Hz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To evaluate current knowledge and develop cooperative research programs with the Soviet Union to assess possible health hazards of exposure to static and low-frequency electromagnetic fields, and to supplement current knowledge with scientifically sound data for establishing reliable exposure limits.

Studies showed that induced currents from 60-Hz transmission lines are too low to represent a seriou...

The biological effects of 60-Hz electric fields at levels typically encountered in power transmission systems appear to be minimal. No significant health effects were observed in human subjects or experimental animals exposed to these fields. The research indicates that current exposure levels from power transmission systems do not pose significant biological hazards.

Cite This Study
Richard D. Phillips, William T. Kaune (1977). Biological Effects of Static and Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: An Overview of United States Literature.
Show BibTeX
@article{biological_effects_of_static_and_low_frequency_electromagnetic_fields_an_overvie_g6789,
  author = {Richard D. Phillips and William T. Kaune},
  title = {Biological Effects of Static and Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: An Overview of United States Literature},
  year = {1977},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The review focused on static electromagnetic fields (like those from magnets) and extremely low frequency (ELF) fields, which include the 60 Hz power frequency used in electrical systems throughout the United States.
By 1977, enough scientific studies had documented biological effects from electromagnetic fields that researchers needed to systematically review and analyze the existing evidence to understand the scope of potential health impacts.
This review established that scientific concern about EMF biological effects predated wireless technology by decades, focusing on fundamental electromagnetic fields from power systems that remain unchanged in modern electrical infrastructure.
The ELF electromagnetic fields studied in 1977 from power lines and electrical systems remain identical today, meaning this early research directly applies to current daily exposures in homes and workplaces.
They provided the first comprehensive review of United States literature on EMF biological effects, creating a systematic analysis of scattered research findings to establish the scientific foundation for understanding EMF health impacts.