6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

BIOMEDICAL ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION

Proceedings

CDR William C. Milroy, MC, USN · 1974

Share:

The report compiles proceedings from a 1973 symposium on nonionizing radiation bioeffects featuring six invited papers.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The one-day symposium was held on 10 July 1973 at the Naval Weapons Laboratory in Dahlgren, Virginia. The symposium marked the opening and dedication of a new Biomedical Research Laboratory and the start of a multidisciplinary research effort on nonionizing radiation bioeffects. Six invited papers covered bio-engineering, comparative biology, human exposure factors, high power pulses, and EMP bioeffects. The proceedings were published because of a large number of requests for reprints of the presented papers.

Why This Matters

Tyler noted that much of the scientific community had shunned nonionizing radiation research, calling it a pseudo-science due to the lack of a unifying theory. He argued that observations not fitting current concepts should not be automatically rejected if they persist and are validated. Tyler reported that recent studies suggested pulsed radiation may be more effective than continuous waves in producing biological effects. He highlighted that the ANSI C-95 committee expressed concern about peak pulse exposure limits but took no action because of insufficient experimental data. Tyler also pointed out that long-term low-level exposure and frequency dependence were areas experiencing a renaissance, and that there was inadequate data for frequency-based exposure standards.

Cite This Study
CDR William C. Milroy, MC, USN (1974). BIOMEDICAL ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION.
Show BibTeX
@article{biomedical_aspects_of_nonionizing_radiation_g4959,
  author = {CDR William C. Milroy and MC and USN},
  title = {BIOMEDICAL ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION},
  year = {1974},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The symposium marked the opening and dedication of a new Biomedical Research Laboratory and the start of a multidisciplinary research effort on nonionizing radiation bioeffects.
Six invited papers covered bio-engineering, comparative biology, human exposure factors, high power pulses, and EMP bioeffects.
The proceedings were published because of a large number of requests for reprints of the presented papers.
Tyler stated that a major portion of the scientific community had shunned the field, referring to it as a pseudo-science, largely due to the lack of a unifying theory.
Tyler noted that pulsed radiation may be more effective than continuous waves, that long-term low-level exposure and frequency dependence were areas experiencing a renaissance, and that there was insufficient data to set frequency-based exposure standards.