8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Bone Healing Under Alternating Electromagnetic Fields? A Right-Left Trial on Infected Non-unions

Bioeffects Seen

K. M. Stürmer, H. Kehr, K. P. Schmit-Neuerburg, K. Seidel · 1978

Share:

Electromagnetic fields enhanced bone healing only when combined with surgical bone grafts in this canine study.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers tested whether electromagnetic fields could help heal infected bone fractures in 21 beagle dogs, comparing treated and untreated sides. While EMF treatment alone showed minimal benefit, combining it with bone grafts produced significantly more new bone growth in the fracture area.

Why This Matters

This 1978 study reveals the complex relationship between electromagnetic fields and biological healing processes. The science demonstrates that EMF therapy isn't a magic bullet for bone repair, but it can enhance healing when combined with traditional surgical techniques. What makes this particularly relevant today is that we're constantly exposed to electromagnetic fields from our devices and infrastructure. While this study used therapeutic EMF applications, it shows how our bodies respond to electromagnetic energy in measurable ways. The reality is that if controlled EMF exposure can stimulate bone growth, our daily exposure to wireless signals is certainly having biological effects too. The key difference lies in the frequency, intensity, and duration of exposure.

Finding

One group showed more periosteal reaction on the treated side but no better heating. The second group with additional cancellous bone graft developed more new bone in the defect on the electrically treated side compared with the control side.

In their words

“One group showed more periosteal reaction on the treated side but no better heating. The second group with additional cancellous bone graft developed more new bone in the defect on the electrically treated side compared with the control side.”

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
K. M. Stürmer, H. Kehr, K. P. Schmit-Neuerburg, K. Seidel (1978). Bone Healing Under Alternating Electromagnetic Fields? A Right-Left Trial on Infected Non-unions.
Show BibTeX
@article{bone_healing_under_alternating_electromagnetic_fields_a_right_left_trial_on_infe_g4723,
  author = {K. M. Stürmer and H. Kehr and K. P. Schmit-Neuerburg and K. Seidel},
  title = {Bone Healing Under Alternating Electromagnetic Fields? A Right-Left Trial on Infected Non-unions},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

This study found that electromagnetic field treatment alone provided minimal benefit for infected bone fractures in dogs. However, when combined with bone grafts, EMF treatment produced significantly more new bone formation compared to grafts alone.
Beagle dogs have bone healing patterns similar to humans and are commonly used in orthopedic research. The researchers created controlled fractures in both forearm bones of 21 female beagles to compare treated versus untreated healing.
The Kraus method uses alternating electromagnetic fields and AC-transducers placed directly at the bone fracture site. This 1978 study applied this technique to infected non-healing bone fractures to stimulate bone repair and growth.
Scientists used multiple advanced techniques including X-rays, microangiography, microradiography, polychrome sequence labeling, stained histology, and polarization microscopy. These methods allowed them to assess new bone formation, blood vessel growth, and healing progression in detail.
Bone grafts combined with electromagnetic field treatment developed significantly more new bone in the fracture defect compared to grafts without EMF treatment. This suggests electromagnetic fields can enhance the effectiveness of surgical bone repair techniques.