Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on an auditory order threshold task
Cinel C, Boldini A, Russo R, Fox E · 2007
View Original AbstractForty minutes of mobile phone radiation showed no effect on hearing performance in this controlled study of 168 people.
Plain English Summary
Researchers tested whether 40 minutes of mobile phone radiation affects hearing ability by having 168 people perform an auditory task while exposed to phone signals at two different power levels. The study found no significant changes in hearing performance during radiation exposure compared to sham (fake) exposure. This suggests that short-term mobile phone use doesn't impair basic auditory processing abilities.
Why This Matters
This study provides reassuring evidence that acute mobile phone exposure doesn't impair auditory function, at least for the specific hearing task tested. The researchers used SAR levels of 1.4 and 11.2 W/kg - with the higher level significantly exceeding typical phone emissions, which usually stay below 2 W/kg. What makes this research particularly valuable is its robust methodology, testing 168 participants with both real and sham exposures to control for placebo effects. However, this single study examines just one aspect of auditory function over a relatively short timeframe. The reality is that we need more research examining longer-term exposures and other aspects of hearing health, especially given that some studies have suggested potential links between heavy mobile phone use and hearing changes.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 1.4 and 11.2 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 888 MHz mobile phones
- Exposure Duration
- continuous for 40 min
Exposure Context
This study used 1.4 and 11.2 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 3.5x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
To study the effect of acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields generated by mobile phones on an auditory threshold task
168 participants performed the task while exposed to RF EMF in one testing session (either global sy...
No significant effect of exposure to RF EMF was detected, suggesting that acute exposure to RF EMFs ...
Show BibTeX
@article{c_2007_effects_of_mobile_phone_2740,
author = {Cinel C and Boldini A and Russo R and Fox E},
title = {Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on an auditory order threshold task},
year = {2007},
doi = {10.1002/bem.20321},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.20321},
}Cited By (20 papers)
- Recent Advances in Research on Radiofrequency Fields and Health: 2004–2007Influential
R. Habash et al. (2009) - 49 citations
- EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
I. Belyaev et al. (2016) - 212 citations
- Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields on the Human Nervous System
E. van Rongen et al. (2009) - 105 citations
- Review of possible modulation‐dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields
J. Juutilainen et al. (2011) - 78 citations
- Recent Advances in Research on Radiofrequency Fields and Health: 2001–2003
D. Krewski et al. (2007) - 58 citations
- Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on performance and electrophysiology in adolescents, young adults and older adults.
S. Leung et al. (2011) - 55 citations
- Effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM 900 and WCDMA mobile phones on cognitive function in young male subjects
C. Sauter et al. (2011) - 41 citations
- Exposure to Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Fields and Subjective Symptoms: A Double-Blind Study
C. Cinel et al. (2008) - 41 citations
- Cointegration of event-related potential (ERP) signals in experiments with different electromagnetic field (EMF) conditions
Argiro E. Maganioti et al. (2010) - 39 citations
- Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks SCENIHR Health
P. Hartemann et al. (2009) - 37 citations