6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Catfish and Electric Fields

Bioeffects Seen

R. C. Peters, J. Meek · 1972

Share:

Finding

The electrophysiological tests for regeneration carried out at 50 and 100 days failed to elicit any response which was clearly indicative of the growth of axons across the lesion. Histological examination of specimens revealed that regeneration had not occurred because of the presence of a large cavity between the cut ends of the tract.

In their words

“The electrophysiological tests for regeneration carried out at 50 and 100 days failed to elicit any response which was clearly indicative of the growth of axons across the lesion. Histological examination of specimens revealed that regeneration had not occurred because of the presence of a large cavity between the cut ends of the tract.”
Cite This Study
R. C. Peters, J. Meek (1972). Catfish and Electric Fields.
Show BibTeX
@article{catfish_and_electric_fields_g7411,
  author = {R. C. Peters and J. Meek},
  title = {Catfish and Electric Fields},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.