Project NEMESIS: perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment)
Mueller CH, Krueger H, Schierz C · 2002
View Original AbstractSeven out of 63 volunteers showed statistically significant ability to perceive a 50 Hz EMF, suggesting a small sensitive subgroup exists.
Plain English Summary
This double-blind laboratory experiment tested whether people can perceive a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at 100 V/m and 6 μT, and whether self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is related to that ability. A total of 63 volunteers, 49 with self-reported EHS and 14 controls, each judged 10 sham and 10 exposed two-minute blocks in randomized order. Seven of the 63 subjects reached a statistically significant result, but there was no relevant difference between self-reported EHS subjects and controls in perception success rate or in the number and types of symptoms reported.
Why This Matters
Researchers found that self-reported EHS was not a prerequisite for consciously perceiving weak EMF, and perceiving weak EMF was not a prerequisite for self-reported EHS. The absence of a difference in symptom types and counts between EHS and non-EHS participants was one of the notable findings.
Exposure Details
- Magnetic Field
- 0.006 mT
- Electric Field
- 100 V/m
- Source/Device
- 50 Hz
- Exposure Duration
- 2 min
Exposure Context
This study used 100 V/m for electric fields:
- 333.3x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.3 V/m
This study used 0.006 mT for magnetic fields:
- 300x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.2 mG
- 60x above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 1 mG
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The double blind laboratory experiment tested the hypothesis that there are subjects with the ability to perceive 50 Hz EMF at 100 V/m and 6 μT (EMF sensitive) and to investigate the prevalence of EMF sensitivity in a group consisting of subjects with or without self-reported EHS.
A total of 63 volunteers, 49 with EHS and 14 controls, took part in the EMF perception experiment, w...
Seven out of 63 subjects reached a statistically significant result which points to the existence of...
The results of the EMF perception experiment suggest that EHS is not a prerequisite for the ability to consciously perceive weak EMF and vice versa.
Show BibTeX
@article{ch_2002_project_nemesis_perception_of_499,
author = {Mueller CH and Krueger H and Schierz C},
title = {Project NEMESIS: perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment)},
year = {2002},
doi = {10.1002/bem.95},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.95},
}Cited By (42 papers)
- Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review of Provocation StudiesInfluential
G. J. Rubin et al. (2005) - 210 citations
- Novel exposure units for at‐home personalized testing of electromagnetic sensibilityInfluential
A. Huss et al. (2016) - 2 citations
- Novel ExposureUnits forat-Home PersonalizedTestingof ElectromagneticInfluential
Sensibility et al. (2015)
- Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure--a questionnaire survey.
M. Röösli et al. (2004) - 211 citations
- Perception of Mobile Phone and Base Station Risks
M. Siegrist et al. (2005) - 135 citations
- Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): A systematic review of identifying criteria
C. Baliatsas et al. (2012) - 101 citations
- Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity
N. Leitgeb, J. Schröttner (2003) - 98 citations
- Sensitivity to electricity – Temporal changes in Austria
J. Schröttner, N. Leitgeb (2008) - 69 citations
- Effect of short‐wave (6–22 MHz) magnetic fields on sleep quality and melatonin cycle in humans: the Schwarzenburg shut‐down study
E. Altpeter et al. (2006) - 62 citations