6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Changes in Gene Expression After Exposing Arabidopsis thaliana Plants to Nanosecond High Amplitude Electromagnetic Field Pulses

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 2024

Share:

The treatment did not significantly change most gene expression but induced APX-1 and APX-6.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed Arabidopsis thaliana plants to 30,000 pulses emitted through a Koshelev antenna. They monitored expression of genes involved in calcium metabolism, signal transduction, ROS, and energy status. The treatment did not significantly change mRNA levels of calmodulin, ZAT12, RBOH D and F, CAT2, GSH1, GSH2, SnRK1, or TOR. However, APX-1 and APX-6 were significantly induced three hours after exposure. These results suggest that this treatment, although quite strong in amplitude, is mostly ineffective in inducing biological effects at the transcriptional level when delivered by an antenna.

Why This Matters

Previous work showed that similar pulses delivered via immersed electrodes effectively trigger calcium and ROS responses. The effects of these pulses are poorly documented when delivered through an antenna.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2024). Changes in Gene Expression After Exposing Arabidopsis thaliana Plants to Nanosecond High Amplitude Electromagnetic Field Pulses.
Show BibTeX
@article{changes_in_gene_expression_after_exposing_arabidopsis_thaliana_plants_to_nanosecond_high_amplitude_electromagnetic_field_pulses_ce2971,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Changes in Gene Expression After Exposing Arabidopsis thaliana Plants to Nanosecond High Amplitude Electromagnetic Field Pulses},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.1002/bem.22475},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The plants received 30,000 pulses at 237 kV/m with a 280 ps rise-time and 500 ps duration from a Koshelev antenna.
Ascorbate peroxidases APX-1 and APX-6 were significantly induced three hours after exposure.
The treatment did not significantly change messenger RNA accumulation of calmodulin or Zinc-Finger protein ZAT12.
The authors suggest that the treatment, although quite strong in amplitude, is mostly ineffective in inducing biological effects at the transcriptional level when delivered by an antenna.
Earlier research found that pulses delivered by immersed electrodes effectively trigger calcium and ROS responses, while antenna delivery effects are poorly documented.