6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Comments on ANSI-C95 Document Research Needed for Establishing Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Standards

Bioeffects Seen

Sol M. Michaelson

Share:

Michaelson argues the 10 mW/cm² standard came from Herman Schwan's heat calculations for a 70 kg man, not from tissue-heating research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Michaelson states that the 10 mW/cm² standard was proposed by Herman Schwan for the US Navy based on heat production calculations for a 70 kg man. He notes that USSR and East European limits are misrepresented as a single 10 μW/cm² value when higher levels are allowed for various exposure durations. Michaelson points out that the US Air Force found no increased cataract incidence in servicemen over 20 years.

Why This Matters

Michaelson objects to the term "thermal load" and suggests using "thermal input" instead. He notes a misspelling of the word "clarify" in the document. Michaelson states that the gall bladder and gastrointestinal tract do not have poor blood circulation and questions their vulnerability to microwave exposure. He points out that Imig's results on testes are misinterpreted and should specify the experimental animal.

Cite This Study
Sol M. Michaelson (n.d.). Comments on ANSI-C95 Document Research Needed for Establishing Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Standards.
Show BibTeX
@article{comments_on_ansi_c95_document_research_needed_for_establishing_electromagnetic_r_g5221,
  author = {Sol M. Michaelson},
  title = {Comments on ANSI-C95 Document Research Needed for Establishing Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Standards},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Michaelson says the standard was proposed by Herman Schwan for the US Navy based on heat production calculations for a 70 kg man, not primarily from tissue heating research.
Michaelson states the US Air Force found no increased cataract incidence in servicemen over 20 years and that no conclusive evidence shows cataracts in humans from low-level exposure.
He objects to the term "thermal load" preferring "thermal input" and notes a misspelling of "clarify."