8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

CONSIDERATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR A RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE FIELDS

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1978

Share:

NIOSH recognized RF/microwave workplace hazards requiring protection standards in 1978, decades before widespread consumer wireless adoption.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1978 NIOSH technical report established criteria and considerations for recommended standards protecting workers from radiofrequency and microwave field exposures. The document addressed occupational safety limits for RF/microwave radiation in workplace environments. This represents early government recognition that RF and microwave exposures required formal worker protection standards.

Why This Matters

What makes this 1978 NIOSH report particularly significant is its timing and source. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health was already recognizing that radiofrequency and microwave fields posed enough of a workplace hazard to warrant formal exposure standards. This wasn't industry self-regulation or academic speculation - this was the federal agency responsible for worker safety determining that RF/microwave protection was necessary.

The reality is that workplace RF exposures in 1978 were often orders of magnitude higher than what most people experience today from consumer devices. Yet NIOSH still felt compelled to establish protective standards. Today's ubiquitous wireless devices may operate at lower power levels, but they expose the general population - including children - to RF fields that concerned occupational safety experts decades ago. The science demonstrating biological effects has only grown stronger since then.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 500 kHz to 300 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 500 kHz to 300 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To develop a recommended occupational exposure standard for worker protection from radiofrequency (RF) and microwave fields, including criteria for permissible exposure limits and safety measures.

NIOSH initiated development of a criteria document including: NIOSH research and field studies, exte...

The document presents findings on biological effects of RF/microwave exposure, including thermal and...

The recommended standard is frequency dependent, with the greatest concern in the 10-500 MHz range where maximum human absorption occurs. The standard should avoid exposure levels that cause net rise in body temperature (10 mW/sq cm). A cautious approach is recommended pending further research on nonthermal effects. Engineering controls, monitoring, and medical surveillance are essential components of the recommended standard.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1978). CONSIDERATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR A RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE FIELDS.
Show BibTeX
@article{considerations_and_criteria_for_a_recommended_standard_for_occupational_exposure_g5363,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {CONSIDERATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR A RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE FIELDS},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

NIOSH determined that radiofrequency and microwave fields in workplace environments posed sufficient health risks to workers that formal exposure standards and protection criteria were necessary for occupational safety.
The federal occupational safety agency recognized that RF and microwave field exposures in workplace settings required protective limits to prevent potential health effects in workers exposed to these electromagnetic fields.
Workplace RF exposures in 1978 were typically much higher than consumer device exposures today, yet NIOSH still deemed them hazardous enough to require formal worker protection standards and safety criteria.
If NIOSH required worker protection from RF fields in 1978, it raises questions about current safety assumptions for widespread consumer wireless device exposures affecting the general population today.
This 1978 technical report represents early federal recognition of RF/microwave health risks, with NIOSH taking the lead in establishing occupational exposure criteria before widespread consumer wireless technology adoption.