8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General357 citations

Cuppen, T Kozicz, L

Bioeffects Seen

de Kleijn S, G. · 2016

Share:

This crystal structure prediction study was incorrectly categorized as EMF health research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be about crystal structure prediction methods rather than EMF health effects. The research presented results from blind testing of computational methods used to predict how organic molecules arrange themselves in crystal form. This represents progress in materials science and pharmaceutical research applications.

Why This Matters

This study appears to have been misclassified in our EMF research database. The research focuses on computational chemistry methods for predicting crystal structures, not electromagnetic field health effects. This type of misclassification highlights an important issue in EMF research - the need for careful study selection and categorization. While computational modeling is valuable in many scientific fields, including some aspects of EMF research for understanding biological interactions, this particular study doesn't contribute to our understanding of electromagnetic field health impacts. The reality is that maintaining accurate databases of EMF health research requires vigilant curation to ensure studies actually address electromagnetic field exposures and their biological effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
de Kleijn S, G. (2016). Cuppen, T Kozicz, L.
Show BibTeX
@article{cuppen_t_kozicz_l_ce4009,
  author = {de Kleijn S and G.},
  title = {Cuppen, T Kozicz, L},
  year = {2016},
  doi = {10.1107/S2052520616007447},
  
}
DOI: 10.1107/S2052520616007447PubMed: 27484368

Quick Questions About This Study

This study doesn't relate to EMF health effects. It focuses on computational methods for predicting how organic molecules arrange in crystals, which is materials science rather than electromagnetic field research.
This appears to be a database categorization error. The study examines crystal structure prediction methods, not electromagnetic field health effects, and shouldn't be classified as EMF research.
Yes, legitimate EMF research does use computational models to understand how electromagnetic fields interact with biological tissues, but this particular study focuses on crystal chemistry instead.
EMF health databases should include studies examining electromagnetic field exposures and their biological effects on living organisms, not general chemistry or materials science research like crystal structure prediction.
Look for studies that specifically examine electromagnetic field sources, biological effects, exposure levels, and health outcomes in living organisms rather than computational chemistry or materials science applications.