Cuppen, T Kozicz, L
de Kleijn S, G. · 2016
This crystal structure prediction study was incorrectly categorized as EMF research and contains no electromagnetic field health data.
Plain English Summary
This study appears to be about crystal structure prediction methods rather than EMF health effects. The research focused on testing computational methods for predicting how organic crystals arrange themselves, particularly for salts, hydrates, and flexible molecules. This represents a chemistry and materials science study, not EMF research.
Why This Matters
This study appears to have been incorrectly categorized in our EMF research database. The research by de Kleijn and colleagues deals with computational chemistry methods for predicting crystal structures, not electromagnetic field health effects. This highlights an important issue in EMF research databases - proper categorization and quality control are essential for maintaining scientific credibility. When evaluating EMF health studies, it's crucial to verify that research actually addresses electromagnetic field exposures and biological effects. Misclassified studies like this one can dilute the quality of evidence databases and make it harder for both researchers and the public to access relevant, accurate information about EMF health effects.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Show BibTeX
@article{cuppen_t_kozicz_l_ce4345,
author = {de Kleijn S and G.},
title = {Cuppen, T Kozicz, L},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1107/S2052520616007447},
}