6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2011

Share:

Exposure to pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals at 0.023 W/kg SAR reduced NB69 cell numbers by 13.5% but did not affect HepG2 cells.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed two human cancer cell lines to a 2.2 GHz pulse-modulated radar-like signal for 24 hours at an average SAR of 0.023 W/kg. The exposure was subthermal with a temperature rise below 0.1 °C. NB69 neuroblastoma cells showed a 13.5% reduction in cell number and increases in G0/G1 and G2/M phase proportions, while HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells did not respond.

Why This Matters

A complete discretized model of the exposure setup was created for numerical dosimetry using FDTD software SEMCAD X. The authors concluded that pulse-modulated RF radiation with high instantaneous amplitude and low average power can induce cytostatic responses in specific sensitive cancer cell lines. They suggested the effect is mediated at least in part by alterations in cell cycle kinetics.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 2.2 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 2.2 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2011). Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals.
Show BibTeX
@article{cytostatic_response_of_nb69_cells_to_weak_pulse_modulated_22_ghz_radar_like_signals_ce751,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals},
  year = {2011},
  doi = {10.1002/bem.20643},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The study used a 2.2 GHz pulse-modulated radar-like signal with 5 µs pulse duration, 100 Hz repetition rate, at an average SAR of 0.023 W/kg for 24 hours.
NB69 neuroblastoma cells showed a 13.5% reduction in cell number and significant increases in the proportions of cells in G0/G1 and G2/M phases.
The hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2 did not respond to the same RF treatment.
The average dose of RF radiation absorbed by the cultures was calculated to be subthermal with a temperature rise below 0.1 °C.
The authors suggested the effect is mediated at least in part by alterations in the kinetics of the cell cycle.