8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Ding H-M, Wang X, Mo W-C, Qin L-L, Wong S, Fu J-P, Tan Y, Liu Y, He R- Q, Hua Q

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2019

Share:

This particle physics study was incorrectly classified as EMF health research and has no relevance to electromagnetic field biological effects.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be misclassified in the EMF database - it actually examines particle physics decay rates at the Large Hadron Collider, not electromagnetic field health effects. The research measured branching fractions of B meson decays using proton-proton collision data, finding results compatible with standard model predictions.

Why This Matters

This entry highlights a critical issue in EMF research databases: misclassification of unrelated scientific studies. While the Large Hadron Collider does generate electromagnetic fields, this particle physics research has no relevance to EMF health effects or human exposure concerns. The study examines subatomic particle decay patterns in high-energy physics experiments, not biological responses to electromagnetic radiation. This type of database error undermines public trust and scientific credibility in EMF health research. When evaluating EMF studies, it's essential to verify that research actually addresses biological effects of electromagnetic field exposure, not unrelated physics phenomena that happen to involve electromagnetic processes.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2019). Ding H-M, Wang X, Mo W-C, Qin L-L, Wong S, Fu J-P, Tan Y, Liu Y, He R- Q, Hua Q.
Show BibTeX
@article{ding_h_m_wang_x_mo_w_c_qin_l_l_wong_s_fu_j_p_tan_y_liu_y_he_r_q_hua_q_ce4357,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Ding H-M, Wang X, Mo W-C, Qin L-L, Wong S, Fu J-P, Tan Y, Liu Y, He R- Q, Hua Q},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The study examines subatomic particle decay rates at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, not biological effects of electromagnetic fields on living organisms.
No. While the LHC uses electromagnetic fields, this research studies fundamental particle physics, not how electromagnetic radiation affects human health or biological systems in everyday environments.
B meson decay studies test predictions of the Standard Model of particle physics. They help physicists understand fundamental forces and particles, but have no connection to EMF health research.
Look for research that specifically examines biological organisms exposed to electromagnetic fields, measures health endpoints, and uses frequencies relevant to everyday EMF sources like cell phones or power lines.
Yes. Misclassified studies dilute legitimate EMF health research and can mislead the public. Always verify that studies actually examine electromagnetic field effects on biological systems before drawing health conclusions.