8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Cancer & Tumors

Effects of 60-Hz fields, estradiol and xenoestrogens on human breast cancer cells

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 1996

Share:

Power line frequency EMF failed to stimulate breast cancer cell growth or DNA damage, unlike estrogen.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Oak Ridge National Laboratory researchers tested whether 60 Hz electromagnetic fields (power line frequency) could stimulate human breast cancer cell growth or damage DNA, similar to estrogen and chemical compounds. The study found that while estrogen and xenoestrogens promoted cancer cell division, 60 Hz EMF exposure at various strengths had no effect on cell growth, DNA damage, or gene expression.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 60 Hz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Unknown (1996). Effects of 60-Hz fields, estradiol and xenoestrogens on human breast cancer cells.
Show BibTeX
@article{effects_of_60_hz_fields_estradiol_and_xenoestrogens_on_human_breast_cancer_cells_ce1591,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Effects of 60-Hz fields, estradiol and xenoestrogens on human breast cancer cells},
  year = {1996},
  doi = {10.2307/3579306},
  
}
DOI: 10.2307/3579306PubMed: 8927716

Quick Questions About This Study

No, this study found that 60 Hz electromagnetic fields at strengths up to 9 gauss did not stimulate human breast cancer cell division, DNA damage, or gene expression changes, unlike estrogen which clearly promoted cell growth.
Researchers tested 60 Hz fields at 12 milligauss, 1 gauss, and 9 gauss. For comparison, typical home exposures are 1-4 milligauss, making these test levels significantly higher than normal household EMF exposure.
No, simultaneous exposure to 60 Hz fields and chemical promoters did not increase cancer cell activity beyond what the chemical promoter alone produced, suggesting no synergistic or co-promotional effects.
Scientists measured cyclin-dependent kinase 2 activity, cyclin D1 synthesis, and cdc2 activity - all key indicators of whether cells are entering the growth cycle that leads to cancer cell division.
No, 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure did not increase p53-DNA binding or cause DNA damage markers, while known DNA-damaging agents and certain chemical compounds clearly did cause these harmful effects.