Whole Body / General8,154 citations
Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (studies published from 1990 on)
Bioeffects Seen
Authors not listed · 1990
View Original AbstractInsufficient information to determine key finding.
Plain English Summary
Summary written for general audiences
This is a review article examining electromagnetic field exposure studies published from 1990 onward. Without access to the abstract, the specific findings and scope of the review cannot be determined from the title alone.
Why This Matters
As a review article rather than original research, this work likely synthesizes existing literature on EMF health effects across multiple studies. The 1990 start date suggests it captures research from the early period of modern EMF health effects investigations.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Cite This Study
Unknown (1990). Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (studies published from 1990 on).
Show BibTeX
@article{effects_of_exposure_to_electromagnetic_fields_studies_published_from_1990_on_ce4711,
author = {Unknown},
title = {Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (studies published from 1990 on)},
year = {1990},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297},
url = {http://www.saferemr.com/2018/02/effects-of-exposure-to-electromagnetic.html},
}Quick Questions About This Study
STROBE is a 22-item checklist that helps researchers properly report observational health studies. It ensures studies include essential details about methods, participants, and results so readers can evaluate study quality and reliability.
Poor reporting makes it impossible to assess whether EMF studies used appropriate exposure levels, followed subjects long enough, or controlled for confounding factors. Without these details, you can't determine if results apply to real-world exposure scenarios.
STROBE-compliant studies provide clear information about exposure measurement, study duration, participant characteristics, and statistical methods. This transparency allows you to evaluate whether the research addresses meaningful health questions about EMF exposure.
STROBE requires reporting of study design, participant selection, exposure measurement methods, outcome definitions, statistical approaches, potential biases, and funding sources. These details are essential for interpreting study reliability and relevance.
Many EMF studies, particularly industry-funded research, fail to meet STROBE standards by omitting exposure details, statistical methods, or conflict-of-interest disclosures. This incomplete reporting hampers proper evaluation of study quality and conclusions.