6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

EFFECTS OF MICROWAVES ON FEATHER RELEASE IN CHICKENS

Bioeffects Seen

Stephen A. Kula, B.F. Miller, H.L. Enos · 1978

Share:

Microwave feather release showed a potential energy savings of 34% compared to hot water scalding.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

A total of 193 birds were processed by microwave. In the first trial, feather tracts were divided into two groups that responded similarly to microwave feather release: the torso and the extremities. Good feather release depended on bird weight, power, time, and whether the area was torso or extremities. Microwave feather release used an estimated 132 BTU per bird versus 200 BTU for hot water scalding, a potential energy savings of 34%.

Why This Matters

The study established a standard of 3.5 newtons as the maximum force permissible for good feather release. All feather tracts on each bird were tested for both feather release and tissue damage. Microwave energy was presented as an alternative to water scalding that avoids water pollution and potential contamination while reducing energy consumption.

Cite This Study
Stephen A. Kula, B.F. Miller, H.L. Enos (1978). EFFECTS OF MICROWAVES ON FEATHER RELEASE IN CHICKENS.
Show BibTeX
@article{effects_of_microwaves_on_feather_release_in_chickens_g4728,
  author = {Stephen A. Kula and B.F. Miller and H.L. Enos},
  title = {EFFECTS OF MICROWAVES ON FEATHER RELEASE IN CHICKENS},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Microwave feather release showed a potential energy savings of 34% compared to hot water scalding.
Good feather release depended on the bird's weight, the power used, the time stressed, and whether the feather area was the torso or extremities.
A total of 193 birds were processed by microwave.
A standard of 3.5 newtons was established as the maximum force permissible for good feather release.
Feather tracts were divided into two groups: the torso (spinal, femoral, and ventral tracts) and the extremities (ala caudal, crural, and humeral tracts), which responded similarly to microwave treatment.