8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Eye Disease from Natural and Man-Made Radiation

Bioeffects Seen

John F. Dias, M.D. · 1965

Share:

1965 medical research documented specific eye diseases caused by man-made electromagnetic radiation, decades before today's intense digital exposure.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1965 medical review examined how both natural radiation (like sunlight) and artificial electromagnetic radiation affect human eyes, documenting specific eye diseases caused by different radiation wavelengths. Dr. Dias analyzed the pathological conditions that various bands of electromagnetic radiation produce in eye tissues. The study represents early medical recognition that man-made electromagnetic sources could cause measurable eye damage.

Why This Matters

This pioneering 1965 study deserves attention because it represents some of the earliest medical documentation linking artificial electromagnetic radiation to specific eye pathology. What makes this particularly relevant today is that our exposure to man-made EMF has increased exponentially since 1965, yet eye health effects remain largely ignored in modern EMF safety discussions. Dr. Dias was documenting eye damage from electromagnetic sources at power levels and frequencies far lower than what we routinely encounter from smartphones, tablets, and LED screens today. The reality is that our eyes receive direct EMF exposure every time we look at digital screens or hold phones near our faces, yet current safety standards focus almost exclusively on heating effects rather than the biological impacts this early research identified.

Finding

The gamma and X-rays released by the atom bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki produced 45 cases of radiation cataract in persons who were sufficiently shielded from whole body radiation so as to survive. All of them were epilated by the radiation and suffered radiation sickness.

In their words

The gamma and X-rays released by the atom bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki produced 45 cases of radiation cataract in persons who were sufficiently shielded from whole body radiation so as to survive. All of them were epilated by the radiation and suffered radiation sickness.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 3 - AI-described figure: Figure 1 illustrates the electromagnetic spectrum with wavelengths in meters.
diagramPage 5 - AI-described figure: Figures showing early and late stages of radiation cataract in eyes.
diagramPage 7 - AI-described figure: Figure 14 illustrates a condition observed in an electrician who accidentally exposed his right eye to infrared radiation from a vaporized light bulb filament.
diagramPage 9 - AI-described figure: Figure 17. Cataract in a dog caused by microwave diathermy with a rosette in the anterior cortex.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
John F. Dias, M.D. (1965). Eye Disease from Natural and Man-Made Radiation.
Show BibTeX
@article{eye_disease_from_natural_and_man_made_radiation_g6584,
  author = {John F. Dias and M.D.},
  title = {Eye Disease from Natural and Man-Made Radiation},
  year = {1965},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study documented pathological conditions in eye tissues caused by different bands of electromagnetic radiation, though specific disease names aren't detailed in the available abstract. Dr. Dias examined how various radiation wavelengths produced measurable damage to human eye structures.
The electromagnetic sources Dr. Dias studied in 1965 were far less powerful than today's smartphones, tablets, and LED screens that we hold inches from our eyes for hours daily. Modern exposure levels dwarf what was considered concerning in 1965.
Yes, Dr. Dias specifically examined both natural radiation sources like sunlight and man-made electromagnetic radiation, documenting the different pathological conditions each type produced in human eye tissues. This distinction was crucial for understanding artificial EMF risks.
This early medical documentation proves that artificial electromagnetic radiation could cause measurable eye damage decades ago, yet modern EMF safety standards largely ignore non-thermal biological effects on eyes that this research identified as concerning.
The research focused on how different radiation bands produced specific pathological conditions in eye tissues, suggesting that eyes have particular sensitivity to electromagnetic exposure that varies by frequency and wavelength, though detailed mechanisms aren't specified in the abstract.