6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors.

No Effects Found

Momoli F, Siemiatycki J, McBride ML, Parent MÉ, Richardson L, Bedard D, Platt R, Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Krewski D. · 2017

View Original Abstract
Share:

High mobile phone use was associated with increased glioma risk but not with meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in the Canadian Interphone data.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers re-analyzed Canadian data from the 13-country Interphone case-control study (2001–2004) to evaluate associations between mobile phone use and risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. For glioma, the odds ratio for the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) compared to non-regular users was 2.0 (95% CI 1.2–3.4), and after adjusting for selection and recall biases it became 2.2 (95% limits 1.3–4.1). There was little evidence of increased risk for meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors.

Why This Matters

Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect the interpretation of the Canadian results. The researchers applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires to address recall error and selective participation. The modeling aimed to adjust for these sources of uncertainty and to facilitate interpretation.

Study Details

We undertook a re-analysis of the Canadian data from the 13-country case-control Interphone Study (2001–2004), in which researchers evaluated the associations of mobile phone use with the risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors.

We applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model to address possible biases simultaneously, using vali...

For glioma, when comparing those in the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) to those who w...

Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in our results from Canadian data.

Cite This Study
Momoli F, Siemiatycki J, McBride ML, Parent MÉ, Richardson L, Bedard D, Platt R, Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Krewski D. (2017). Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors. Am J Epidemiol. 186(7):885-893, 2017.
Show BibTeX
@article{f_2017_probabilistic_multiplebias_modeling_applied_3509,
  author = {Momoli F and Siemiatycki J and McBride ML and Parent MÉ and Richardson L and Bedard D and Platt R and Vrijheid M and Cardis E and Krewski D.},
  title = {Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors.},
  year = {2017},
  
  url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5860390/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The researchers re-analyzed Canadian data from the 13-country Interphone case-control study conducted from 2001 to 2004.
For glioma, the odds ratio for the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) versus non-regular users was 2.0 (95% CI 1.2–3.4). After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits 1.3–4.1).
There was little evidence of an increase in the risk of meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in relation to mobile phone use.
They applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires to address recall error and selective participation.
Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in the Canadian results.