6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Federal Radiation Protection Guidance; Proposed Alternatives for Controlling Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation; Notice of Proposed Recommendations

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1986

Share:

The EPA proposed four alternative approaches to limit public exposure to radiofrequency radiation, including three regulatory options and one nonregulatory option.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The EPA proposed four alternative approaches to limit public exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Three options are regulatory and would set whole-body average SAR limits of 0.04, 0.08, and 0.4 W/kg for frequencies above 3 MHz. For frequencies below 3 MHz, the regulatory options would limit electric field intensity to 87, 275, and 614 V/m and magnetic field intensity to 0.23, 0.73, and -1.63 A/m respectively. The fourth option is nonregulatory and would use information and technical assistance programs instead of adopting Federal Guidance.

Exposure Details

SAR
0.04 W/kg
Electric Field
87 V/m

Exposure Context

This study used 87 V/m for electric fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.04 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Severe Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 40 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 10 kHz to 100 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 10 kHz to 100 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Unknown (1986). Federal Radiation Protection Guidance; Proposed Alternatives for Controlling Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation; Notice of Proposed Recommendations.
Show BibTeX
@article{federal_radiation_protection_guidance_proposed_alternatives_for_controlling_publ_g5050,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Federal Radiation Protection Guidance; Proposed Alternatives for Controlling Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation; Notice of Proposed Recommendations},
  year = {1986},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The EPA proposed four alternative approaches to limit public exposure to radiofrequency radiation.
Options 1, 2, and 3 would limit whole-body average SAR to 0.04, 0.08, and 0.4 W/kg respectively for frequencies above 3 MHz.
For frequencies below 3 MHz, the limits are 87 V/m and 0.23 A/m for Option 1, 275 V/m and 0.73 A/m for Option 2, and 614 V/m and -1.63 A/m for Option 3.
The nonregulatory option would conduct information and technical assistance programs instead of adopting Federal Guidance.