8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Reproductive Health

Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez- Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2025

Share:

Prenatal exposure to 5G-frequency radiation caused lasting male fertility damage in this study.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Scientists exposed pregnant rats to 3.5 GHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to 5G frequencies) and examined the male offspring at 12 months old. The study found significant damage to sperm production, including smaller testicular structures, abnormal sperm, and increased cell death. This suggests that wireless radiation exposure during pregnancy may have lasting effects on male fertility.

Why This Matters

This research adds concerning evidence to the growing body of science linking prenatal EMF exposure to reproductive harm. The 3.5 GHz frequency used matches early 5G deployment frequencies, making these findings particularly relevant as wireless infrastructure expands globally. What makes this study especially significant is the long-term follow-up - the researchers didn't just look at immediate effects but tracked the animals for a full year, revealing that prenatal EMF damage persists into adulthood.

The science demonstrates multiple pathways of harm: structural damage to sperm-producing tissues, DNA breaks, increased cell death, and abnormal sperm formation. These aren't subtle changes - the statistical significance levels (some as low as 6.36 × 10^-9) indicate robust, reproducible effects. For context, pregnant women today are surrounded by similar frequencies from cell towers, WiFi routers, and mobile devices. The reality is that we're conducting an uncontrolled experiment on developing fetuses without adequate safety testing.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 3.5 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 3.5 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2025). Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez- Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S.
Show BibTeX
@article{gelenli_dolanbay_e_mert_t_caliskan_bender_g_bektas_h_uslu_u_fernandez_rodriguez_ce_dasdag_s_ce2785,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez- Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1111/nyas.70116},
  
}
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.70116PubMed: 41128732

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, this study found that prenatal exposure to 3.5 GHz radiation caused significant testicular damage in male rat offspring examined at 12 months old, including reduced sperm production structures and increased abnormal sperm formation.
The study found that full-gestation exposure (3T group) caused more severe testicular damage than late-gestation exposure (2T group), with significantly reduced seminiferous tubule diameter and epithelial height compared to controls.
Prenatal 3.5 GHz exposure significantly increased abnormal sperm morphology and reduced Johnsen scores (a measure of sperm production quality) in adult male offspring compared to unexposed controls.
This study demonstrates that prenatal EMF effects persist long-term, with significant testicular damage, DNA breaks, and increased cell death still evident when male offspring were examined at 12 months of age.
Yes, both exposure groups showed significantly elevated γ-H2AX immunostaining scores, indicating increased DNA double-strand breaks in testicular tissue, along with higher rates of programmed cell death (apoptosis).