8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Reproductive Health

Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez-Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2025

Share:

Prenatal exposure to 5G frequencies caused permanent reproductive damage in male offspring, raising serious questions about wireless safety during pregnancy.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed pregnant rats to 3.5 GHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to 5G frequencies) and found that their male offspring developed severe testicular damage by adulthood. The exposed rats showed reduced sperm production, increased DNA damage, and higher rates of cell death in reproductive tissues compared to unexposed controls.

Why This Matters

This study delivers sobering evidence about 5G's potential reproductive risks, using the 3.5 GHz frequency that forms the backbone of many 5G networks worldwide. What makes these findings particularly concerning is the permanence of the damage - prenatal exposure led to lifelong reproductive impairment that persisted into adulthood. The researchers used rigorous statistical methods and found dose-dependent effects, with longer exposure periods causing more severe damage.

The reality is that pregnant women today are surrounded by these frequencies from 5G cell towers, small cells, and devices. While we can't directly extrapolate from rat studies to humans, the biological mechanisms observed - DNA damage, increased cell death, and disrupted sperm production - operate similarly across mammalian species. This research adds to growing evidence that our rush to deploy 5G technology may be creating reproductive health consequences we're only beginning to understand.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 3.5 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 3.5 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2025). Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez-Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S.
Show BibTeX
@article{gelenli_dolanbay_e_mert_t_caliskan_bender_g_bektas_h_uslu_u_fernandez_rodriguez_ce_dasdag_s_ce3691,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Gelenli Dolanbay E, Mert T, Caliskan Bender G, Bektas H, Uslu U, Fernandez-Rodriguez CE, Dasdag S},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.1111/nyas.70116},
  
}
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.70116PubMed: 41128732

Quick Questions About This Study

This study found that prenatal exposure to 3.5 GHz radiation caused lasting testicular damage that persisted into adulthood. Male rats showed reduced sperm production, abnormal sperm shape, and increased DNA damage throughout their reproductive tissues even 12 months after birth.
The study tested two exposure periods during pregnancy. Full-gestation exposure (throughout pregnancy) caused more severe damage than late-gestation exposure, but both groups showed significant reproductive harm including increased cell death and DNA damage compared to unexposed controls.
Prenatal 3.5 GHz exposure reduced the diameter of seminiferous tubules (where sperm develop) and decreased epithelial height. It also significantly increased abnormal sperm morphology and elevated markers of DNA damage, autophagy, and programmed cell death throughout testicular tissue.
The study exposed pregnant rats to 3.5 GHz radiation for just 2 hours daily and found significant reproductive damage in male offspring. This included impaired spermatogenesis, increased DNA damage markers, and higher rates of testicular cell death that persisted into adulthood.
Yes, the timing matters significantly. Full-gestation exposure caused more severe testicular damage than late-gestation exposure only. However, both exposure periods resulted in significantly higher rates of DNA damage and cell death compared to unexposed controls, indicating vulnerability throughout pregnancy.