Do mobile phone base stations affect sleep of residents? Results from an experimental double-blind sham-controlled field study.
Danker-Hopfe H, Dorn H, Bornkessel C, Sauter C. · 2010
View Original AbstractThe study found no significant differences in sleep quality between real and sham base station exposure, but participants with health concerns had worse sleep during sham nights.
Plain English Summary
Researchers conducted a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized cross-over study with 397 residents exposed to GSM base station signals and sham exposure at home for 12 nights. No significant differences in objective or subjective sleep measures were found between real and sham exposure conditions. During sham exposure nights, participants with concerns about health risks from base stations had significantly worse sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and subjective sleep latency than those without concerns. The authors concluded that EMF from base stations did not affect sleep quality, but the presence of base stations themselves may negatively impact sleep.
Why This Matters
Researchers collected individual EMF exposure measurements and administered questionnaires on sleep disorders, overall sleep quality, attitudes toward mobile communication, and subjective sleep quality via morning and evening protocols. Objective sleep data were recorded using frontal EEG and EOG.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. The study examined exposure from: 900 MHz and 1,800 MHz
Study Details
The aim of the present double-blind, sham-controlled, balanced randomized cross-over study was to disentangle effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and non-EMF effects of mobile phone base stations on objective and subjective sleep quality.
In total 397 residents aged 18-81 years (50.9% female) from 10 German sites, where no mobile phone s...
Analysis of the subjective and objective sleep data did not reveal any significant differences betwe...
The study did not provide any evidence for short-term physiological effects of EMF emitted by mobile phone base stations on objective and subjective sleep quality. However, the results indicate that mobile phone base stations as such (not the electromagnetic fields) may have a significant negative impact on sleep quality.
Show BibTeX
@article{h_2010_do_mobile_phone_base_2012,
author = {Danker-Hopfe H and Dorn H and Bornkessel C and Sauter C.},
title = {Do mobile phone base stations affect sleep of residents? Results from an experimental double-blind sham-controlled field study.},
year = {2010},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20737608/},
}Cited By (59 papers)
- A systematic review of factors that contribute to nocebo effects.Influential
Rebecca K. Webster et al. (2016) - 152 citations
- Chapter 1. General introduction
François Grin et al. (2015) - 296 citations
- The nocebo effect: a clinical challenge in the era of biosimilars
L. Pouillon et al. (2018) - 77 citations
- Top-down control of arousal and sleep: Fundamentals and clinical implications.
L. Krone et al. (2017) - 76 citations
- Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Sleep Quality: A Prospective Cohort Study
E. Mohler et al. (2012) - 60 citations
- Long-term effect of mobile phone use on sleep quality: Results from the cohort study of mobile phone use and health (COSMOS)
G. Tettamanti et al. (2020) - 51 citations
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses
M. Dieudonné (2020) - 49 citations
- Wireless communication fields and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a literature review
M. Röösli, K. Hug (2011) - 44 citations
- Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer.
A. Balmori (2022) - 43 citations