8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Heating of Biological Tissue in the Induction Field of VHF Portable Radio Transmitters

Bioeffects Seen

QUIRINO BALZANO, OSCAR GARAY, FRANCES R. STEEL · 1978

Share:

VHF portable radios cause minimal tissue heating despite strong external fields because human tissue blocks wave penetration.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers tested how VHF portable radio transmitters heat human tissue using realistic phantom models of the head and body. They found that despite high field measurements near the antenna, actual tissue heating was minimal (less than 0.1°C) because the radio waves don't penetrate effectively into biological tissue. The only health risk occurs if someone places the antenna tip directly against their eye.

Why This Matters

This 1978 study provides crucial insights into how proximity to transmitting antennas affects human tissue heating. The research demonstrates that field strength measurements alone can be misleading - what matters is how much energy actually penetrates and heats biological tissue. The scientists found that VHF radio waves from handheld transmitters cause surprisingly little heating because human tissue's electrical properties cause the fields to collapse at the skin surface. This finding has important implications for understanding EMF exposure from modern devices. While portable radios operate at different frequencies than today's cell phones, the principle remains relevant: the relationship between external field strength and internal tissue effects is complex and depends heavily on frequency, antenna design, and tissue properties.

Finding

The results of the measurements performed on the head phantom have shown that a 6-W portable radio with a helical antenna held at 0.2 in from the operator's mouth causes very little heating of the simulated biological tissue (less than 0.1°C is highest temperature increase for one minute exposure). The maximum power density penetrating the dummy is less than 1 mW/cm2 in the middle forehead. No detectable temperature increase is present in the immediate eye area.

In their words

The results of the measurements performed on the head phantom have shown that a 6-W portable radio with a helical antenna held at 0.2 in from the operator's mouth causes very little heating of the simulated biological tissue (less than 0.1°C is highest temperature increase for one minute exposure). The maximum power density penetrating the dummy is less than 1 mW/cm2 in the middle forehead. No detectable temperature increase is present in the immediate eye area.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 2 - AI-described figure: Experimental temperature changes over time at different depths and positions after radiation exposure (Figs. 3 and 4).
diagramPage 3 - AI-described figure: Temperature profile in a phantom with muscle and fat layers, as shown in Fig. 5.
diagramPage 4 - AI-described figure: Figure 8: Temperature profile showing temperature distribution on a head model with various points labeled for temperature measurement.
graphPage 5 - AI-described figure: Figure 6 and Figure 7 show power density measurements in mW/cm² as a function of distance from an antenna, with one graph at 150 MHz frequency.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
QUIRINO BALZANO, OSCAR GARAY, FRANCES R. STEEL (1978). Heating of Biological Tissue in the Induction Field of VHF Portable Radio Transmitters.
Show BibTeX
@article{heating_of_biological_tissue_in_the_induction_field_of_vhf_portable_radio_transm_g4673,
  author = {QUIRINO BALZANO and OSCAR GARAY and FRANCES R. STEEL},
  title = {Heating of Biological Tissue in the Induction Field of VHF Portable Radio Transmitters},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Less than 0.1°C temperature increase after one minute of exposure from a 6-watt radio held 0.2 inches from the mouth. The maximum power density penetrating tissue was less than 1 mW/cm2 in the forehead area.
Human flesh has a high complex dielectric constant that causes the strong static-like fields from VHF helical antennas to collapse at the air-body interface, preventing deep penetration into tissue.
Only if the antenna tip is placed within 0.5 inches of the eye. During normal use, eyes are exposed to relatively low fields at the antenna base, causing no detectable temperature increase.
Two models: a rectangular body phantom (26×9×6.5 inches) with simulated muscle, fat and bone layers, and a human-sized head phantom with a bone shell containing simulated brain material.
Commercial field probes indicated power levels above 10 mW/cm2, but actual tissue penetration was much lower due to the directional nature of VHF helical antenna fields and tissue electrical properties.