8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

Human Exposure to Nonionizing Radiant Energy—Potential Hazards and Safety Standards

Bioeffects Seen

S. M. Michaelson · 1972

Share:

A 1972 study warned of growing EMF health risks from expanding technology, calling for better safety standards that remain inadequate today.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1972 review examined the growing health concerns from electromagnetic radiation sources including microwaves, radio frequencies, and lasers used in military, industrial, and consumer applications. The study highlighted significant gaps in safety knowledge and called for better protection standards to prevent both immediate and long-term health effects. The research emphasized the urgent need for scientific data to establish credible safety limits as electromagnetic technology rapidly expanded.

Why This Matters

This landmark 1972 paper represents one of the earliest comprehensive warnings about the electromagnetic radiation explosion we were experiencing even five decades ago. What's striking is how prescient Michaelson's concerns were - he identified the fundamental challenge we still face today: setting safety standards without adequate long-term health data. The science demonstrates that we've been conducting a massive population experiment, deploying EMF-emitting technologies faster than we can study their effects.

The reality is that Michaelson's call for 'scientific competence' and 'credible knowledge' remains largely unheeded. We're now surrounded by exponentially more EMF sources than existed in 1972 - smartphones, WiFi, smart meters, 5G networks - yet our safety standards still rely on the same flawed assumptions about thermal effects only. This early recognition of the problem makes our current regulatory inaction even more troubling.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
S. M. Michaelson (1972). Human Exposure to Nonionizing Radiant Energy—Potential Hazards and Safety Standards.
Show BibTeX
@article{human_exposure_to_nonionizing_radiant_energy_potential_hazards_and_safety_standa_g3675,
  author = {S. M. Michaelson},
  title = {Human Exposure to Nonionizing Radiant Energy—Potential Hazards and Safety Standards},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The study identified microwaves, radio-frequency waves, ultraviolet, infrared, visible light, and laser radiation from military, industrial, consumer, entertainment, and medical equipment as potential hazards requiring safety evaluation.
Researchers faced the challenge of defining what constitutes a biological 'effect,' measuring long-term impacts, and lacking clear relationships between exposure levels and health outcomes across multiple variables.
Scientists worried about both acute immediate effects and chronic long-term health impacts from electromagnetic radiation, particularly as technology expanded rapidly without adequate safety data or protection standards.
They emphasized the urgent need for better regulation to reduce exposure while maintaining beneficial technology use, calling for scientific competence to create legally defensible safety standards.
Scientists identified critical knowledge gaps about personnel hazards, exposure reduction methods, long-term effects on humans and offspring, and the relationship between exposure levels and biological effects.