6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics

No Effects Found

C. J. Chilton

Share:

Early research explored whether humans naturally communicate through electromagnetic fields, raising questions about wireless interference with biological systems.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This review examined research on biological radio communication, exploring whether humans and other organisms might naturally transmit or receive electromagnetic signals. The study investigated concepts like telepathy, biocurrents, and electromagnetic field interactions with biological systems. While no specific findings are available, this represents early scientific inquiry into whether living beings use electromagnetic frequencies for communication.

Why This Matters

This review touches on one of the most intriguing questions in bioelectromagnetics: whether our bodies naturally function as both transmitters and receivers of electromagnetic signals. While the concept of 'biological radio communication' might sound like science fiction, the reality is that all living cells generate measurable electrical currents and electromagnetic fields. Your heart produces electrical signals strong enough to detect several feet away, and your brain's neural activity creates electromagnetic patterns that EEGs can measure.

What makes this research particularly relevant today is that we're now surrounded by artificial electromagnetic fields at intensities millions of times stronger than our natural bioelectric signals. If our bodies do rely on subtle electromagnetic communication for proper cellular function, the constant interference from WiFi, cell towers, and wireless devices could potentially disrupt these natural processes. The science is still developing, but understanding our body's natural electromagnetic environment becomes crucial as we evaluate the biological effects of our increasingly wireless world.

Exposure Details

Magnetic Field
500 µT

Exposure Context

This study used 500 µT for magnetic fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 500 µTExtreme Concern - 5 mGFCC Limit - 2,000 mGEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 400 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 1 Hz to 1 kHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 1 Hz to 1 kHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

To review the literature on biological radio communication and related topics, particularly examining the scientific understanding of electromagnetic fields produced by biological systems and their potential role in communication.

The paper concludes that while there is limited scientific evidence for human detection of small changes in electromagnetic fields, research into biological electromagnetic fields has advanced significantly. Recent technological developments in magnetocardiography and magnetoencephalography have enabled measurement of magnetic fields from the heart and brain. The research suggests that the human nervous system may produce detectable electromagnetic fields, though the practical implications for communication remain speculative.

Cite This Study
C. J. Chilton (n.d.). Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics.
Show BibTeX
@article{human_telecommunications_a_review_of_the_literature_on_biological_radio_communic_g5524,
  author = {C. J. Chilton},
  title = {Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, all living cells generate measurable electrical currents and electromagnetic fields. Your heart's electrical activity can be detected several feet away, and brain neurons create electromagnetic patterns that medical devices routinely measure during EEGs and other diagnostic procedures.
Biological radio communication refers to the theoretical ability of living organisms to transmit or receive information through natural electromagnetic signals. This concept explores whether cells, tissues, or organisms might use electromagnetic frequencies for intercellular communication or coordination of biological processes.
This is an active area of research. Our natural bioelectric signals operate at extremely low intensities, while modern wireless devices emit electromagnetic fields millions of times stronger. Scientists are investigating whether this artificial electromagnetic 'noise' might disrupt normal cellular communication processes.
Biocurrents are the natural electrical currents that flow through living tissues. These include nerve impulses, heart rhythms, muscle contractions, and cellular membrane potentials. Every biological process involving ion movement creates measurable electrical currents that contribute to our body's electromagnetic signature.
Early bioelectromagnetics researchers investigated telepathy as a potential natural electromagnetic phenomenon. They theorized that if brains generate measurable electromagnetic fields, perhaps some individuals might be sensitive enough to detect these signals from others, providing a scientific basis for reported telepathic experiences.