6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics

No Effects Found

C. J. Chilton

Share:

Exposure Details

Magnetic Field
500 µT

Exposure Context

This study used 500 µT for magnetic fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 500 µTExtreme Concern - 5 mGFCC Limit - 2,000 mGEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 400 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 1 Hz to 1 kHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 1 Hz to 1 kHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
C. J. Chilton (n.d.). Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics.
Show BibTeX
@article{human_telecommunications_a_review_of_the_literature_on_biological_radio_communic_g5524,
  author = {C. J. Chilton},
  title = {Human Telecommunications: A review of the Literature on "Biological Radio Communication" and related topics},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.