Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.
Imaida, K, Taki, M, Watanabe, S, Kamimura, Y, Ito, T, Yamaguchi, T, Ito, N, Shirai, T, · 1998
View Original AbstractCell phone radiation at 1.439 GHz showed no cancer-promoting effects in rat livers despite causing measurable biological stress responses.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed rats to 1.439 GHz radiofrequency radiation (the type used in Japanese cell phones) to see if it would promote liver cancer development. Despite using exposure levels up to 1.91 W/kg and finding evidence of biological stress (increased stress hormones), the radiation did not increase cancer-promoting changes in the liver. This suggests that cell phone radiation at these levels does not accelerate liver cancer progression in this animal model.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 1.439 GHz Duration: 90 min a day, 5 days a week, over 6 weeks
Study Details
In the present study, a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic near-field (EMF), another microwave band employed for cellular phones in Japan, was similarly investigated.
Time division multiple access (TDMA) signals for the Personal Digital Cellular (PDC) Japanese cellul...
Despite increased serum levels of corticosterone, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and melatonin, ...
These findings clearly indicated that local body exposure to a 1.439 GHz EMF, as in the case of a 929.2 MHz field, has no promoting effect on rat liver carcinogenesis in the present model.
Show BibTeX
@article{imaida_1998_the_15_ghz_electromagnetic_3099,
author = {Imaida and K and Taki and M and Watanabe and S and Kamimura and Y and Ito and T and Yamaguchi and T and Ito and N and Shirai and T and},
title = {The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.},
year = {1998},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9849576/},
}Cited By (60 papers)
- Lack of effects of 1439 MHz electromagnetic near field exposure on the blood–brain barrier in immature and young ratsInfluential
Masanori Kuribayashi et al. (2005) - 73 citations
- Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic miceInfluential
P. Heikkinen et al. (2003) - 53 citations
- Studying the effects of mobile phone use on the auditory system and the central nervous system: a review of the literature and future directionsInfluential
A. Kaprana et al. (2008) - 40 citations
- Lack of promotion of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-initiated mouse skin carcinogenesis by 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near fields.Influential
K. Imaida et al. (2001) - 31 citations
- Experimental Studies on Carcinogenicity of Radiofrequency Radiation in AnimalsInfluential
J. Juutilainen et al. (2011) - 23 citations
- Radiofrequency Biology: In vivoInfluential
Masamichi Kato (2006) - 3 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Thermal therapy, part 1: an introduction to thermal therapy.
R. Habash et al. (2006) - 296 citations
- Cell phones and cancer: what is the evidence for a connection?
J. Moulder et al. (1999) - 199 citations
- MOBILE TELEPHONES AND CANCER—A REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
M. Kundi et al. (2004) - 185 citations