8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
DNA & Genetic Damage1,726 citations

Int J Radiat Biol 86(1):27-36, 2010

Bioeffects Seen

Hao Y, Yang X, Chen C, Yuan-Wang, Wang X, Li M, Yu Z · 2010

Share:

Insufficient information to determine key finding.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Insufficient information to generate summary. The provided citation includes only the journal reference, year, and organism type, but no title, abstract, or study details were provided to analyze.

Why This Matters

A complete study record requires the title and abstract to accurately assess the research scope and findings related to EMF effects on plant organisms.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Hao Y, Yang X, Chen C, Yuan-Wang, Wang X, Li M, Yu Z (2010). Int J Radiat Biol 86(1):27-36, 2010.
Show BibTeX
@article{int_j_radiat_biol_86127_36_2010_ce2813,
  author = {Hao Y and Yang X and Chen C and Yuan-Wang and Wang X and Li M and Yu Z},
  title = {Int J Radiat Biol 86(1):27-36, 2010},
  year = {2010},
  doi = {10.1038/nature08747},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The Brachypodium genome study focuses entirely on plant genetics and crop development, with no electromagnetic field research components or health effect investigations.
No, this research examines the natural genetic sequence of a grass species used as a model organism for crop improvement. It contains no radiation exposure studies or electromagnetic field investigations.
Brachypodium serves as a model organism for understanding larger grass genomes like wheat, barley, and oats. Its small size and rapid growth make it ideal for agricultural genetics research.
While Brachypodium is used in various plant biology studies, this particular genome sequencing paper focuses solely on establishing genetic reference data for crop development, not EMF effects research.
Database errors like this dilute the quality of EMF research collections and can confuse researchers and the public about the actual state of electromagnetic field health effects science.