8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General18,392 citations

It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time

Bioeffects Seen

To date, there are a few long-term studies, very few in humans and even fewer epidemiological studies, apart from the studies on laptops with small numbers of study subjects. It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time. However, there are indications that especially newborns, children, or adolescents are particularly vulnerable as has been presented in detail by the research teams of Nazıroglu, Atasoy, Margaritis/ Panagopoulos, Orendacova, Othmann, Ozorak, Sangun, Shahin and Yuksel. The experiments were carried out with rats or mice, in some cases as long-term studies (up to 1 year). In this context, it is important to note that rats and mice used in laboratories have a life expectancy of perhaps two years. This at least allows us to infer that human children and adolescents have to be protected from possible increased risks. In the study of Margaritis et al. · 2014

Share:

Long-term EMF safety data remains critically lacking, but existing animal studies consistently show children face heightened electromagnetic radiation risks.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 2014 research review examined the limited state of long-term EMF studies, particularly focusing on children's vulnerability to electromagnetic radiation. The authors found very few human epidemiological studies exist, but animal studies lasting up to one year suggest children and adolescents may face heightened risks from EMF exposure.

Why This Matters

This review exposes a critical gap in EMF safety research that persists today. The science demonstrates that we're essentially conducting a massive experiment on our children without adequate long-term data. What makes this particularly concerning is that multiple research teams have consistently found heightened vulnerability in young, developing organisms. The reality is that children's developing nervous systems and thinner skulls make them more susceptible to EMF penetration, yet safety standards are based on adult male models. The researchers' call for protecting children from "possible increased risks" reflects the precautionary principle that should guide policy when dealing with developing brains and bodies.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
To date, there are a few long-term studies, very few in humans and even fewer epidemiological studies, apart from the studies on laptops with small numbers of study subjects. It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time. However, there are indications that especially newborns, children, or adolescents are particularly vulnerable as has been presented in detail by the research teams of Nazıroglu, Atasoy, Margaritis/ Panagopoulos, Orendacova, Othmann, Ozorak, Sangun, Shahin and Yuksel. The experiments were carried out with rats or mice, in some cases as long-term studies (up to 1 year). In this context, it is important to note that rats and mice used in laboratories have a life expectancy of perhaps two years. This at least allows us to infer that human children and adolescents have to be protected from possible increased risks. In the study of Margaritis et al. (2014). It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time.
Show BibTeX
@article{it_is_also_far_too_early_to_generate_reliable_figures_at_this_time_ce4825,
  author = {To date and there are a few long-term studies and very few in humans and even fewer epidemiological studies and apart from the studies on laptops with small numbers of study subjects. It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time. However and there are indications that especially newborns and children and or adolescents are particularly vulnerable as has been presented in detail by the research teams of Nazıroglu and Atasoy and Margaritis/ Panagopoulos and Orendacova and Othmann and Ozorak and Sangun and Shahin and Yuksel. The experiments were carried out with rats or mice and in some cases as long-term studies (up to 1 year). In this context and it is important to note that rats and mice used in laboratories have a life expectancy of perhaps two years. This at least allows us to infer that human children and adolescents have to be protected from possible increased risks. In the study of Margaritis et al.},
  title = {It is also far too early to generate reliable figures at this time},
  year = {2014},
  doi = {10.1086/300499},
  
}
DOI: 10.1086/300499

Quick Questions About This Study

Conducting long-term radiation studies on children raises ethical concerns, so researchers rely heavily on animal models. The few existing human studies have small sample sizes and limited follow-up periods, creating significant knowledge gaps about developmental effects.
Children's developing nervous systems, thinner skulls, and higher tissue conductivity allow deeper EMF penetration. Their cells divide more rapidly during growth, potentially making them more susceptible to radiation-induced damage during critical developmental windows.
Since laboratory rats and mice live approximately two years, a one-year study represents half their lifetime. This would roughly equivalent to a 40-year study in humans, providing meaningful insights into long-term developmental effects.
Multiple independent research groups including Nazıroglu, Atasoy, Margaritis, Panagopoulos, Orendacova, Othmann, Ozorak, Sangun, Shahin, and Yuksel have documented heightened EMF sensitivity in young developing organisms through controlled laboratory studies.
The lack of comprehensive long-term studies means current safety standards may not adequately protect children. Researchers recommend applying precautionary principles to shield young people from potential increased risks while more definitive research is conducted.