8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving.

Bioeffects Seen

Stutts J, Feaganes J, Rodgman E, Hamlett C, Reinfurt D, Gish K, Mercadante M, Staplin L. · 2003

View Original Abstract
Share:

This 2003 study documented measurable driving impairment from cell phone use, establishing baseline evidence for wireless device risks that have only intensified with smartphone adoption.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers installed hidden cameras in 70 drivers' vehicles to study what distracts them while driving and how these distractions affect their performance behind the wheel. They found that the most common distractions were eating and drinking, fumbling with objects inside the car, and looking at things outside the vehicle - many of which led to measurably worse driving performance. This research helps identify which everyday activities pose the greatest risks to road safety.

Why This Matters

While this study doesn't directly examine EMF exposure, it provides crucial context for understanding how cell phone use affects driving safety - a key concern in EMF health research. The researchers documented cell phone conversations as one category of driver distraction, finding measurable impacts on driving performance when drivers were engaged in phone calls. What makes this particularly relevant is that this study was conducted in 2003, when cell phone use was far less prevalent than today. The reality is that modern smartphones create far more complex distractions than the simple voice calls examined here, with texting, social media, and navigation apps creating cognitive loads that this early research couldn't anticipate. This baseline data becomes even more significant when we consider that today's drivers face exponentially more wireless device distractions, making the need for EMF exposure research and digital wellness practices more urgent than ever.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving.

To document drivers’ exposure to potential distractions and the effects of these distractions on dri...

The most common distractions in terms of overall event durations were eating and drinking (including...

Although many of the distractions were also associated with negative driving performance outcomes, further research is needed to clarify their impact on driving safety.

Cite This Study
Stutts J, Feaganes J, Rodgman E, Hamlett C, Reinfurt D, Gish K, Mercadante M, Staplin L. (2003). The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 47:235-251, 2003.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2003_the_causes_and_consequences_2726,
  author = {Stutts J and Feaganes J and Rodgman E and Hamlett C and Reinfurt D and Gish K and Mercadante M and Staplin L.},
  title = {The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving.},
  year = {2003},
  
  url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217550/},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Researchers using hidden cameras in 70 vehicles found eating and drinking were the most common distractions, followed by fumbling with objects inside the car and looking at things outside the vehicle. These everyday activities measurably worsened driving performance in real-world conditions.
Yes, this 2003 hidden camera study of 70 drivers revealed that eating, drinking, and reaching for objects inside vehicles were the most frequent distractions. Many of these common behaviors led to measurably worse driving performance behind the wheel.
Scientists installed hidden cameras in 70 drivers' personal vehicles to observe natural behavior without driver awareness. This methodology allowed researchers to identify which everyday distractions occurred most frequently and measure their actual impact on driving performance.
The study found that eating, drinking, manipulating vehicle controls, and looking for objects inside the car were associated with negative driving performance outcomes. However, researchers noted that further studies are needed to clarify the full safety impact.
The research showed that outside distractions (often unidentified objects or events) ranked among the top three most common distractions by duration, alongside eating/drinking and inside vehicle distractions. Many outside distractions also correlated with worse driving performance.