Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Calcium-ion movement and contractility in atrial strips of frog heart are not affected by low-frequency-modulated, 1 GHz electromagnetic radiation.
Schwartz JL, Mealing GA · 1993
View Original AbstractFrog heart tissue showed no immediate changes from 32-minute RF exposure, but this doesn't establish long-term cardiac safety in humans.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed frog heart tissue to 1 GHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 32 minutes at various power levels to see if it affected calcium movement and heart muscle contractions. They found no changes in either calcium flow or the heart muscle's ability to contract, even at the highest exposure levels tested. This suggests that short-term RF exposure at these frequencies may not directly disrupt basic heart muscle function.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 1 GHz Duration: 32 min
Study Details
To investigate the effects of AM or CW modulated 1 GHz exposure on calcium efflux and contractile force of isolated atrial muscle stripes of frog heart in vitro.
Calcium efflux from electrically stimulated, 45Ca(2+)-preloaded atrial strips of the frog heart was ...
Neither unmodulated nor 0.5 Hz or 16 Hz modulated 1 GHz waves affected the movement of calcium ions ...
Show BibTeX
@article{jl_1993_calciumion_movement_and_contractility_3385,
author = {Schwartz JL and Mealing GA},
title = {Calcium-ion movement and contractility in atrial strips of frog heart are not affected by low-frequency-modulated, 1 GHz electromagnetic radiation. },
year = {1993},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8297396/},
}Cited By (19 papers)
- Calcium homeostasis of isolated heart muscle cells exposed to pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields.Influential
S. Wolke et al. (1996) - 52 citations
- The roles of intensity, exposure duration, and modulation on the biological effects of radiofrequency radiation and exposure guidelinesInfluential
H. Lai, B. Levitt (2022) - 28 citations
- IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz
Ieee Standards Board (1992) - 1,365 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Electromagnetic cellular interactions.
M. Cifra et al. (2011) - 334 citations
- Cell phone radiation: Evidence from ELF and RF studies supporting more inclusive risk identification and assessment.
C. Blackman (2009) - 66 citations
- Biological effects of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency radiation.
Jukka Juutilainen, R. Seze (1998) - 59 citations
- Exposure to GSM RF Fields Does Not Affect Calcium Homeostasis in Human Endothelial Cells, Rat Pheocromocytoma Cells or Rat Hippocampal Neurons
R. O’Connor et al. (2010) - 57 citations
- Evidence for non-chemical, non-electrical intercellular signaling in intestinal epithelial cells.
A. Farhadi et al. (2007) - 46 citations
- Membrane potential and currents of isolated heart muscle cells exposed to pulsed radio frequency fields.
K. Linz et al. (1999) - 34 citations