6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Cardiovascular

Lack of effects on heart rate and blood pressure in ketamine-anesthetized rats briefly exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses.

No Effects Found

Jauchem JR, Frei MR, Ryan KL, Merritt JH, Murphy MR · 1999

View Original Abstract
Share:

Ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses showed no immediate heart effects in rats, but long-term impacts remain unstudied.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed anesthetized rats to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses (extremely brief, high-intensity bursts of electromagnetic energy) to see if it affected their heart rate and blood pressure. They found no significant changes in cardiovascular function during the brief exposures. This suggests that short-term exposure to these specific types of electromagnetic pulses may not immediately harm the cardiovascular system.

Why This Matters

This study provides useful data on ultra-wideband (UWB) pulse technology, which is increasingly used in radar systems, medical imaging, and communications. The electric field strengths tested (19-21 kV/m) are extremely high compared to typical environmental exposures, yet the researchers found no immediate cardiovascular effects in anesthetized rats. However, we should interpret these results carefully. The study only examined acute effects during very brief exposures, not the cumulative impact of repeated or prolonged exposure that might occur in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the rats were anesthetized, which could potentially mask some physiological responses. While this research suggests UWB pulses may not pose immediate cardiovascular risks, it doesn't address longer-term effects or other biological systems that might be more sensitive to electromagnetic exposure.

Exposure Details

Electric Field
19000, 21000 V/m
Source/Device
1 kHz
Exposure Duration
2-s exposure periods alternating with 2 s of no exposure, for a total of 2 min)

Exposure Context

This study used 19000, 21000 V/m for electric fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 1 kHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 1 kHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Lack of effects on heart rate and blood pressure in ketamine-anesthetized rats briefly exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses.

Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to pulses produced by a Bournlea ultra-wideband (UWB) puls...

Exposures at a repetition frequency of 1 kHz for 0.5 s or to repetitive pulse trains (2-s exposure p...

These results suggest that acute whole-body exposure to UWB pulses does not have a detrimental effect on the cardiovascular system.

Cite This Study
Jauchem JR, Frei MR, Ryan KL, Merritt JH, Murphy MR (1999). Lack of effects on heart rate and blood pressure in ketamine-anesthetized rats briefly exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(1):117-120, 1999.
Show BibTeX
@article{jr_1999_lack_of_effects_on_3111,
  author = {Jauchem JR and Frei MR and Ryan KL and Merritt JH and Murphy MR},
  title = {Lack of effects on heart rate and blood pressure in ketamine-anesthetized rats briefly exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses.},
  year = {1999},
  
  url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/736767},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

A 1999 study found that ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses at 1 kHz repetition frequency caused no significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure in anesthetized rats. Even brief 0.5-second exposures and longer 2-minute pulse trains produced no cardiovascular effects, suggesting these specific electromagnetic pulses don't immediately harm heart function.
Research on anesthetized rats showed that 1 kHz ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulse exposures produced no significant changes in mean arterial blood pressure. Both short 0.5-second exposures and alternating 2-second pulse trains over 2 minutes failed to affect blood pressure, indicating these brief high-intensity pulses don't acutely impact cardiovascular function.
A controlled study on rats suggests that acute whole-body exposure to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses doesn't have detrimental cardiovascular effects. Researchers found no significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure during brief exposures, indicating these specific high-intensity electromagnetic bursts may not immediately harm heart function.
During 0.5-second exposures to 1 kHz ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses, researchers observed no significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure in anesthetized rats. This brief exposure duration appears insufficient to cause immediate cardiovascular effects, suggesting the heart remains stable during short-term electromagnetic pulse exposure.
A study using alternating 2-second electromagnetic pulse exposures (with 2-second rest periods over 2 minutes total) found no significant cardiovascular effects in rats. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure remained unchanged during these repetitive ultra-wideband pulse trains, indicating this exposure pattern doesn't acutely disrupt cardiovascular function.