Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Repeated exposure of C3H/HeJ mice to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: Lack of effects on mammary tumors.
Jauchem JR, Frei MR, Dusch SJ, Lehnert HM, Kovatch RM · 2001
View Original AbstractExposure to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses had no significant effect on mammary tumor development in C3H/HeJ mice.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed 100 C3H/HeJ mice to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses for 2 minutes once a week for 12 weeks, using 100 sham-control mice for comparison. There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of palpated mammary tumors, latency to tumor onset, rate of tumor growth, or animal survival. Histopathological evaluations also revealed no significant differences between the two groups in numbers of neoplasms across all tissues studied.
Why This Matters
The study investigated pulses composed of an ultra-wideband of frequencies, including those in the RF range. The exposure parameters included a peak electric field of 40 kV/m, a repetition rate of 1 kHz, and a pulse width of 1.9 ns. The researchers described C3H/HeJ mice as a well-established animal model of mammary cancer.
Exposure Details
- Electric Field
- 40000 V/m
- Source/Device
- 435 MHz or 2450 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- 2 min once a week for 12 weeks
Exposure Context
This study used 40000 V/m for electric fields:
- 133.3Kx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.3 V/m
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Study Details
In this study, we investigated the effects of exposure to a unique type of electromagnetic energy: pulses composed of an ultra-wideband (UWB) of frequencies, including those in the RF range.
One hundred C3H/HeJ mice were exposed to UWB pulses (rise time 176 ps, fall time 3.5 ns, pulse width...
There were no significant differences between groups with respect to incidence of palpated mammary t...
Our major finding was the lack of effects of UWB-pulse exposure on promotion of mammary tumors in a well-established animal model of mammary cancer.
Show BibTeX
@article{jr_2001_repeated_exposure_of_c3hhej_3113,
author = {Jauchem JR and Frei MR and Dusch SJ and Lehnert HM and Kovatch RM},
title = {Repeated exposure of C3H/HeJ mice to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: Lack of effects on mammary tumors.},
year = {2001},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11175673/},
}Cited By (33 papers)
- Survival and cancer in laboratory mammals exposed to radiofrequency energyInfluential
J. Elder (2003) - 29 citations
- Experimental Studies on Carcinogenicity of Radiofrequency Radiation in AnimalsInfluential
J. Juutilainen et al. (2011) - 23 citations
- In Vivo Studies on Radiofrequency (100 kHz–300 GHz) Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Cancer: A Systematic ReviewInfluential
Rosanna Pinto et al. (2023) - 13 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation on X-Ray-Induced Tumorigenesis in Mice
P. Heikkinen et al. (2001) - 64 citations
- Lymphoma Development in Mice Chronically Exposed to UMTS-Modulated Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
A. Sommer et al. (2007) - 61 citations
- The Effect of Chronic Exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA or 847.74 MHz CDMA Radiofrequency Radiation on the Incidence of Spontaneous Tumors in Rats
M. L. La Regina et al. (2003) - 60 citations
- Recent Advances in Research on Radiofrequency Fields and Health: 2001–2003
D. Krewski et al. (2007) - 58 citations