Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Effects of gestational exposure to 1.95‐GHz W‐CDMA signals for IMT‐2000 cellular phones: Lack of embryotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats
Ogawa K, Nabae K, Wang J, Wake K, Watanabe S, Kawabe M, Fujiwara O, Takahashi S, Ichihara T, Tamano S, Shirai T · 2009
View Original AbstractPregnant rats exposed to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for 90 minutes daily on gestational days 7–17 at brain SARs up to 2.0 W/kg showed no adverse reproductive or embryotoxic effects.
Plain English Summary
The study exposed four groups of pregnant CD(SD) IGS rats to a 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signal for 90 minutes daily on gestational days 7–17, with spatial average brain SARs of 0.67 and 2.0 W/kg for low and high exposure groups. On gestational day 20, all dams were killed by cesarean section and fetuses were evaluated for numbers of live, dead, and resorbed embryos, placental weights, sex ratios, fetal weights, and external, visceral, and skeletal abnormalities. Maternal body weight gain did not differ between groups, and no adverse effects were observed on any reproductive or embryotoxic parameters.
Why This Matters
The study was designed to test whether gestational exposure to an electromagnetic field targeting the head, similar to that from cellular phones, could affect embryogenesis in rats. The experiment included both a control group and a sham exposure group.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.67,3.1,2,7,0.2,1.5,0.11 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 1.95-GHz W-CDMA
- Exposure Duration
- 90 min/day from day 7 to day 17 of gestation
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The present study was designed to evaluate whether gestational exposure to an EMF targeting the head region, similar to that from cellular phones, might affect embryogenesis in rats.
A 1.95‐GHz wide‐band code division multiple access (W‐CDMA) signal, which is one applied for the Int...
There were no differences in maternal body weight gain. No adverse effects of EMF exposure were obse...
Show BibTeX
@article{k_2009_effects_of_gestational_exposure_2790,
author = {Ogawa K and Nabae K and Wang J and Wake K and Watanabe S and Kawabe M and Fujiwara O and Takahashi S and Ichihara T and Tamano S and Shirai T},
title = {Effects of gestational exposure to 1.95‐GHz W‐CDMA signals for IMT‐2000 cellular phones: Lack of embryotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.1002/bem.20456},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.20456},
}Cited By (43 papers)
- In utero and early‐life exposure of rats to a Wi‐Fi signal: Screening of immune markers in sera and gestational outcomeInfluential
S. Aït-Aïssa et al. (2012) - 27 citations
- European Health Risk Assessment Network on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure EFHRANInfluential
W. Leader et al. (2010) - 14 citations
- Effect of Radiofrequencies Emitted from Mobile Phones and Wi-Fİ on PregnancyInfluential
Hava Bektas, S. Dasdag (2017) - 7 citations
- Sex-dependent impact of perinatal 5G electromagnetic field exposure in the adolescent rat behaviorInfluential
Raphaël Bodin et al. (2023) - 6 citations
- Effect of 6 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field on the development of fetal bonesInfluential
Yasin Karamazı et al. (2024) - 1 citations
- Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A Review
Z. Merhi (2012) - 86 citations
- Wi-Fi and Health: Review of Current Status of Research
K. Foster, J. Moulder (2013) - 85 citations
- Thermal thresholds for teratogenicity, reproduction, and development
M. Ziskin, J. Morrissey (2011) - 79 citations
- Lack of Adverse Effects of Whole-Body Exposure to a Mobile Telecommunication Electromagnetic Field on the Rat Fetus
Satoru Takahashi et al. (2010) - 65 citations
- Effects on rat testis of 1.95-GHz W-CDMA for IMT-2000 cellular phones
N. Imai et al. (2011) - 61 citations